2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hierarchical simulation-through-optimization approach to forest disturbance modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of decision trees (Cohan et al 1983), mathematical programming models (e.g., Reed and Errico 1986, Gassmann 1989, Lilieholm et al 1991, Boychuk and Martell 1996, Martins et al 2005, Constantino et al 2008, Acuna et al 2010, simulation (Van Wagner 1983, Peter andNelsson 2005), combination of Monte Carlo simulation and mathematical programming (Armstrong 2004), Markov chains (Zhou andBuongiorno 2006, Campbell andDewhurst 2007), or heuristics (e.g., Hoganson and Rose 1987, Falcão and Borges 2002, Caro et al 2003, Gonzáélez et al 2005 have proved to provide a framework that facilitates the integration of considerations about wildfire risk in forested landscape management planning models. Van Wagner (1983) pioneered research of modeling approaches to assess the impact of the proportion of burned area on timber supply.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of decision trees (Cohan et al 1983), mathematical programming models (e.g., Reed and Errico 1986, Gassmann 1989, Lilieholm et al 1991, Boychuk and Martell 1996, Martins et al 2005, Constantino et al 2008, Acuna et al 2010, simulation (Van Wagner 1983, Peter andNelsson 2005), combination of Monte Carlo simulation and mathematical programming (Armstrong 2004), Markov chains (Zhou andBuongiorno 2006, Campbell andDewhurst 2007), or heuristics (e.g., Hoganson and Rose 1987, Falcão and Borges 2002, Caro et al 2003, Gonzáélez et al 2005 have proved to provide a framework that facilitates the integration of considerations about wildfire risk in forested landscape management planning models. Van Wagner (1983) pioneered research of modeling approaches to assess the impact of the proportion of burned area on timber supply.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first group incorporates fire risk in a spatially inexplicit manner, either assuming a deterministic amount of losses (Reed and Errico, 1986;Martell, 1994) or using stochastic simulations of fire occurrence (Boychuk and Martel, 1996;Gassmann, 1989;Armstrong, 2004;Haynes and Quigley, 2001;González et al, 2005a). The second, more recent group incorporates fire spread models to assess the impacts of fires explicitly during the planning period (Shifley et al, 2000;Peter and Nelson, 2005;Provencher et al, 2007;Campbell and Dewhurst, 2007). The complexity of the current fire spread models makes it difficult to compare many different candidate plans in terms of fire damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%