2010
DOI: 10.1063/1.3295528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A High Mobility Field-Effect Transistor as an Antenna for sub-THz Radiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conclude that there is an optimum level of I ds that maximizes the responsivity signal whereas higher I ds values will increase NEP and decrease the photoresponse as reported in Ref. . Hence, the drain current can be increased up to an optimal level until the detector noise becomes dominant in the output signal.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…We conclude that there is an optimum level of I ds that maximizes the responsivity signal whereas higher I ds values will increase NEP and decrease the photoresponse as reported in Ref. . Hence, the drain current can be increased up to an optimal level until the detector noise becomes dominant in the output signal.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…This must be partly attributed to the higher power at 0.3 THz (~6 mW) than at 0.15 THz (~3 mW) and to the coupling of the THz radiation to the device that varies with frequency. Moreover, the bonding wires and the metallic pads could play an antenna role to couple the incoming terahertz radiation (linearly polarized) to the 2D electron channel [43][44][45]. To understand how radiation is coupled, devices were rotated in the plane perpendicular to the terahertz beam, and the photoresponse signal was measured for For all the devices at 0.3 THz, a maximum of the photoresponse signal was found when the incoming radiation was parallel to the gate finger pads (see the inset of Figure 9(a) at 0°), showing a maximum photoresponse for all the devices at the same angular position.…”
Section: Polarization Sensitivity Of Photoresponsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, at the higher frequency (0.3 THz) the coupling must be mainly performed through the contact pads and/or the gate fingers. These results are in agreement with previously published ones [70].…”
Section: Polarization Sensitivity Of Photoresponsesupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The photocurrent obtained under excitation at 0.15 THz was much lower than for 0.3 THz because the inefficient coupling of the THz radiation with the structure at lower frequencies. It was demonstrated that the metallic contact is better for coupling the radiation at higher frequencies [70], [84]. The behaviour of both signals when the back-gate bias is vaied is similar and repetitive at both frequencies.…”
Section: Thz Detection Measurements At Low Temperaturementioning
confidence: 94%