2019
DOI: 10.1134/s1023193519010051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Highly Sensitive Ascorbic Acid Sensor Based on Graphene Oxide/CdTe Quantum Dots-Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative standard deviation was measured at two levels of concentration mass of AA, i.e., 45 μg L −1 and 158 μg L −1 and calculated to be 4.2 % and 3.8%, respectively, values indicating the good reproducibility of the proposed assay. The linear detection region of AA in the present study is in several cases better than that determined by the corresponding electrochemical techniques in the literature [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 45 ] On the other hand, the detection limit of the current analytical AA detection methodology is better compared to the majority of those determined with the other corresponding electrochemical techniques available in the literature, with the exception that it is in the same magnitude of Zhao et 2019 [ 20 ], Kaçar and Erden 2020 [ 2 ], Broncová et al 2021 [ 34 ], Pekin et al [ 45 ], as it can be seen from Table 1 .…”
Section: Analytical Performance Of the Proposed Assaymentioning
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relative standard deviation was measured at two levels of concentration mass of AA, i.e., 45 μg L −1 and 158 μg L −1 and calculated to be 4.2 % and 3.8%, respectively, values indicating the good reproducibility of the proposed assay. The linear detection region of AA in the present study is in several cases better than that determined by the corresponding electrochemical techniques in the literature [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 45 ] On the other hand, the detection limit of the current analytical AA detection methodology is better compared to the majority of those determined with the other corresponding electrochemical techniques available in the literature, with the exception that it is in the same magnitude of Zhao et 2019 [ 20 ], Kaçar and Erden 2020 [ 2 ], Broncová et al 2021 [ 34 ], Pekin et al [ 45 ], as it can be seen from Table 1 .…”
Section: Analytical Performance Of the Proposed Assaymentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Meanwhile, for the electrochemical determination of AA, electrodes with modified surfaces have been widely used, overlapping the fulling effect due to oxidation that may occur on the conventional electrode surfaces [ 6 ]. Carbon paste (CPE) [ 12 , 19 ] and glassy carbon (GCE) [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ] modified electrodes are the most commonly used for AA analysis in the available literature. Moreover, Pt modified electrodes with 3,4-diaminobenzoic acid and neutral red [ 34 ] or screen-printed electrodes (SPE) [ 35 , 36 , 37 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the interference was substantial. This is not surprising since ascorbic acid is capable of oxidation at a low applied potential [65]. This should not be a problem for the measurement of glucose in many beverages or, particularly, in plasma, where the concentration of glucose is more than two orders of magnitude higher than that of ascorbic acid [66,67].…”
Section: Reproducibility Repeatability and Interference Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more sensitive, inexpensive and reliable sensor was prepared by Kucukkolbasi et al [ 211 ] based on a GO/CdTeQDs/GC electrode prepared via hydrothermal synthesis of the CdTeQDs followed by drop casting. CV and EIS experiments revealed that the modified electrode showed better performance than the bare GC one.…”
Section: Graphene-based Sensors For Bioactive Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%