2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.disc.2013.04.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hilton–Milner-type theorem and an intersection conjecture for signed sets

Abstract: x r are distinct elements of [n], y 1 ,. .. , y r ∈ [k]} of k-signed r-sets on [n]. Let m := max{0, 2r −n}. We establish the following Hilton-Milnertype theorems, the second of which is proved using the first: (i) If A 1 and A 2 are non-empty cross-intersecting (i.e. any set in A 1 intersects any set in A 2) sub-families of S n,r,k , then We also determine the extremal structures. (ii) is a stability theorem that extends Erdős-Ko-Rado-type results proved by various authors. We then show that (ii) leads to furt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A proof of Theorem 2 appeared in a previous version of this paper (which can still be found on the arXiv), but we were since informed that Theorem 2 is actually a special case of a theorem proved a few years ago by Borg [6] concerning intersecting families of "signed sets". His proof follows basically the same approach.…”
Section: Thenmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A proof of Theorem 2 appeared in a previous version of this paper (which can still be found on the arXiv), but we were since informed that Theorem 2 is actually a special case of a theorem proved a few years ago by Borg [6] concerning intersecting families of "signed sets". His proof follows basically the same approach.…”
Section: Thenmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In [6], Borg determined the structure of the largest non-trivial 1-intersecting subfamilies of L n,r,k . Our second main result extends Borg's result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We should mention that there are several generalisations, extensions and variations of Theorem 1.1; see for example [2,3,5,6,8,11,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%