2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-61030-6_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hybrid CBR Approach for the Long Tail Problem in Recommender Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should also be noted that lower values are better. MAE has been widely used in previous research for predicting the accuracy of recommender systems [3,19,20].…”
Section: Recommendation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should also be noted that lower values are better. MAE has been widely used in previous research for predicting the accuracy of recommender systems [3,19,20].…”
Section: Recommendation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. 22, a switching hybrid approach was proposed to solve the long tail problem in recommendations. A hybrid approach was applied that utilized clustering and genetic algorithms to reduce data sparsity in movie recommendations.…”
Section: Hybrid Recommendation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, a combination of one or more methods called a hybrid recommender system has been applied to overcome the limitations of using one approach and obtain better results [7]. For instance, in [16], a hybrid case based reasoning approach was proposed to solve the long tail problem, which basically refers to items that have few ratings, by switching between collab-orative filtering and content-based filtering. In addition, the authors in [17] implemented a hybrid recommender system that applied clustering technique and an artificial algae algorithm with a multi-level CF approach.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We ran the proposed switching hybrid method and compared with the baseline CF using Euclidean and Pearson similarity, with the CBF and with the method in [16].…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%