2018 IEEE 10th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology,Communication and Control, Environm 2018
DOI: 10.1109/hnicem.2018.8666332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hybrid Genetic Algorithm for Course Scheduling and Teaching Workload Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional course scheduling is a tedious and complex work, and the courses of electronic engineering specialty are relatively complex, which increases the difficulty of course scheduling. It is not only necessary to make reasonable organization and arrangement for students, teachers, and curriculum specialty but also under the continuous expansion and development of the scale of Electronic Engineering students every year, the education of electronic engineering specialty becomes tenser and tenser and manual course scheduling cannot meet the teaching status of electronic engineering specialty [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional course scheduling is a tedious and complex work, and the courses of electronic engineering specialty are relatively complex, which increases the difficulty of course scheduling. It is not only necessary to make reasonable organization and arrangement for students, teachers, and curriculum specialty but also under the continuous expansion and development of the scale of Electronic Engineering students every year, the education of electronic engineering specialty becomes tenser and tenser and manual course scheduling cannot meet the teaching status of electronic engineering specialty [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While smaller instances might be solved by exact algorithms, most real-world problems are large dimensional problems, so there is a need for heuristic methods to obtain near-optimal solutions in reasonable time. The most used ones are metaheuristics like tabu search (Valdes, Crespo and Tamarit, 2002;Yuan and Lan, 2016), simulated annealing (Abramson, 1991;Thompson and Dowsland, 1998;Bellio, Ceschia, Di Gaspero, Schaerf and Urli, 2016;Goh, Kendall and Sabar 2018), genetic and evolutionary algorithms (Beligiannis, Moschopoulosa, Kaperonisa and Likothanassisa, 2008;Susan and Bhutani, 2018;Matias, Fajardo and Medina, 2018), neural networks (Kovačič, 1993), ant colonies (Socha et al, 2003), bee colony algorithm (Bolaji, Kahader and Betar, 2014), particle swarm optimization (Chen and Shih, 2013;Imran Hossain, Akhand, Shuvo, Siddique and Adeli,, 2019), artificial immune algorithm (Yazdani, Naderi and Zeinali, 2017) and hyperheuristics (Burke, McCollum, Meisels, Petrovic, and Qu, 2007b). Besides, there are some studies dealing with the analysis and design of interactive decision support system for timetable management (Piechowiak and Kolski, 2004;Kamisli Ozturk, Ozturk and Sagir, 2010).…”
Section: Problem Complexity and The Need For A Heuristic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic algorithms are quite often used for creating automatized solutions to solve timetable creation challenge. Some of different models based on genetic algorithms are proposed in following papers: [17], [18], [19], [24] [13].…”
Section: Support To the Academic Staffmentioning
confidence: 99%