SHRIMP dating of titanite from metasyenites in the Central Zone of the Limpopo Belt yields a mean 207 Pb/ 206 Pb age of 2010.3 +/-4.5 Ma calculated from twenty-three analyses. This age, combined with petrographic and field observations, suggests the metamorphism in the syenites occurred during the regional Palaeoproterozoic event.Keywords: Limpopo Belt; SHRIMP; titanite; geochronology; Palaeoproterozoic.
IntroductionA unique body of (meta)-syenite intrudes the Alldays Gneiss and outcrops in an elongate, 6.25 x 1.25 km body WNW of Alldays within the Central Zone of the Limpopo Belt, South Africa (Fig 1a + b). A recent study by Rigby et al. (2008a) reveals the metasyenites underwent a metamorphic evolution characterized by a maximum pressure of 7-8 kbar and ~770 o C. The subsequent retrograde path involved a simultaneous P-T decrease along a decompression-cooling path to 4 kbar and ~550 o C. These P-T estimates are 'intermediate' between the high-grade conditions reported by Zeh et al. (2004) and Rigby (2009) for metapelites near Messina and the amphibolite-facies conditions reported by Zeh et al. (2005a,b) and Chudy et al. (2008) for rocks from the Venetia area. Collectively, this data led Rigby et al. (2008a) to postulate the existence of a metamorphic field gradient. However, there are two main tectonometamorphic episodes known in the Central Zone of Limpopo Belt, one in the Neoarchean (e.g. McCourt & Armstrong, 1998; Kroner et al., 1998;Bumby et al., 2001;Bumby & van der Merwe, 2004; Zeh et al., 2007; Millonig et al., 2008; Perchuk et al., 2008; Van Reenen et al., 2008; Gerdes & Zeh, 2009; Zeh et al. 2009) and one in the Palaeoproterozoic (e.g. Jaeckel et al., 1997; Holzer et al., 1998; Kroner et al., 1999; Zeh et al., 2004; Rigby et al., 2008b;Chudy et al., 2008;Eriksson et al., 2009; Gerdes & Zeh, 2009; Rigby et al., 2010; Eriksson et al., 2010a and b; Millonig et al., 2010) and without robust geochronological constraints it is not clear in which event the metasyenites were metamorphosed. Additionally, due to this uncertainty, the existence of the proposed metamorphic field gradient by Rigby et al (2008a) is, at present, mere speculation. In this short communication we present new U-Pb SHRIMP data obtained from titanite in the metasyenites to delineate their age and support the metamorphic field gradient hypothesis.