2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.08.099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A least mean square based active disturbance rejection control for an inertially stabilized platform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The challenging problem of the laser seeker control has also been studied in the framework of active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) (Bai and Zhang, 2018; Zhang et al , 2019; Manojlović et al , 2015; Ferdjali et al , 2021), which recently has drawn considerable attention in the aerospace research and became a viable alternative to other advanced control strategies, mostly due to its robustness and minimal dependency on the plant mathematical model. The ADRC approach enables uniform performance and system stability even in various target tracking tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenging problem of the laser seeker control has also been studied in the framework of active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) (Bai and Zhang, 2018; Zhang et al , 2019; Manojlović et al , 2015; Ferdjali et al , 2021), which recently has drawn considerable attention in the aerospace research and became a viable alternative to other advanced control strategies, mostly due to its robustness and minimal dependency on the plant mathematical model. The ADRC approach enables uniform performance and system stability even in various target tracking tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bai [6] demonstrated an active disturbance rejection control based on least mean square for aerial remote sensing stabilized imaging. J. Fang [7] proposed an adaptive decoupling control system based on neural network to improve the tracking and stability performance of stabilized platforms.…”
Section: Index Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seen from the above researches, the conventional PID control method is widely used in the current industrial process control because of its simplicity and applicability. On this basis, more modern control theories and intelligent control theories have also been applied to stabilized platforms, such as fuzzy control [4], synovial film control [5], autodisturbance control [6], and neural network control [7], etc [8]. However, characterized by non-linearity, time-varying and parameter uncertainty under the disturbance of multiple sources from outside, the stabilized platform requires a control method with high accuracy and high stability in a complex environment.…”
Section: Index Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results and discussions 5.1 Simulation procedure The proposed GWO-SA-based CFO estimation in SCM-OFDM model was simulated in MATLAB, and the corresponding outcomes were attained. Because the literature lags with the CFO estimate using meta-heuristic search algorithms, which is the primary contribution here, we have compared our proposed algorithm with state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms and standard filtering algorithms such as ML (Bai and Zhang, 2018), LMS (Lorito, 1995), PSO (Zhang and Xia, 2017), GA (McCall, 2005) and GWO (Mirjalili et al, 2014) for CFO estimation; it is held with respect to BER and MSE for ten values of SNR. In addition, results were taken for varying values of weight, W adopted in GWO-SA algorithm.…”
Section: Estimating Carrier Frequency Offsetmentioning
confidence: 99%