2023
DOI: 10.1007/s12613-022-2562-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A literature review of MOF derivatives of electromagnetic wave absorbers mainly based on pyrolysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 226 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Presently, the main preparation methods of EM attenuation materials with honeycomb structures involve two elements: one is the preparation of carbon materials, and the other is the construction of honeycomb core structures. The prepared carbon materials dispersed in the impregnation liquid base material are subsequently coated on the honeycomb structural surface. However, this method has at least five disadvantages: The traditional approach is extremely time-consuming, often requiring days to complete because of the low-efficiency fabrication steps involved, such as carbon-based nanofiber/graphene/graphite/nanotube fabrication, adhesive curing and drying, and material stretching, setting, and cutting, with complex processes and long cycles. The preparations of graphene, graphite, carbon nanotubes, or carbon fiber involve complex multistep fabrication processes and suffer from relatively high cost and energy consumption as well as the usage of toxic chemicals An interface between the carbon-containing coating and the honeycomb core structure is ineluctable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, the main preparation methods of EM attenuation materials with honeycomb structures involve two elements: one is the preparation of carbon materials, and the other is the construction of honeycomb core structures. The prepared carbon materials dispersed in the impregnation liquid base material are subsequently coated on the honeycomb structural surface. However, this method has at least five disadvantages: The traditional approach is extremely time-consuming, often requiring days to complete because of the low-efficiency fabrication steps involved, such as carbon-based nanofiber/graphene/graphite/nanotube fabrication, adhesive curing and drying, and material stretching, setting, and cutting, with complex processes and long cycles. The preparations of graphene, graphite, carbon nanotubes, or carbon fiber involve complex multistep fabrication processes and suffer from relatively high cost and energy consumption as well as the usage of toxic chemicals An interface between the carbon-containing coating and the honeycomb core structure is ineluctable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MOF/polymer nanocomposites are suitable candidates, functioning as ligands and forming metal complexes, to deposit metal nanoparticles in their substrate regarding their extraordinary features in structural engineering and regular architecture. [32][33][34] These compounds have the potential to form complexes because of oxygen groups and nitrogen presence. Therefore, they can be used as excellent support in applications related to catalysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), a new type of periodic porous crystal material, possessing large specific surface area, high porosity, and controllable chemical compositions and structures, have potential applications in many fields such as ion conduction, , energy storage, and EMW absorption. However, the electrical insulation of most MOFs hinders their application in EMW absorption materials. To improve the EMW absorption ability of MOF-based materials, high-temperature calcination in an inert atmosphere is usually adopted to convert the MOF template into a porous carbon-based material containing metal/metallic compounds .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%