2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A long short-term recurrent spatial-temporal fusion for myoelectric pattern recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results corroborate the recent literature that the traditional features, e.g. HTD and AR-RMS, can no longer compete with new features [7,13,19,23,25,45]. LSTM and CNN were significantly outperformed by their combination of CNN+LSTM on DB7 and DB5 which in turn demonstrates the power of the spatiotemporal feature learning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results corroborate the recent literature that the traditional features, e.g. HTD and AR-RMS, can no longer compete with new features [7,13,19,23,25,45]. LSTM and CNN were significantly outperformed by their combination of CNN+LSTM on DB7 and DB5 which in turn demonstrates the power of the spatiotemporal feature learning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The electromyographic (EMG) signal, recorded from the stump muscles, is a valuable, rich, complex, and dynamic source of information for prosthesis control. Research shows that providing natural EMG-based feedback with different approaches including grasp/wrist force and movement estimation [1][2][3][4], continuous finger trajectory decoding [5], and discrete movement classification [6,7] could achieve promising results for desirable control of the prosthesis. Machine learning is a candidate tool in mapping motor intent to prosthesis control [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results corroborate the recent literature that the traditional features, e.g. HTD and AR-RMS, can no longer compete with new features [7,13,19,23,25,45].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As an aggregation criterion, we relied on well-acknowledged feature sets, representing a standard benchmark in a field where TD features proved to be highly effective for classification and found widespread employment, i.e. myoelectric-based gesture recognition [32], [38]. Hence, among 11 of the most commonly used feature sets for sEMG-based gesture classification [32], those made by TD metrics were selected: r Hudgins's feature set (HUDFS) [27]: MAV, WL, ZC, and SSC.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%