2004
DOI: 10.1007/s11266-004-1237-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Loss of Credibility: Patterns of Wrongdoing Among Nongovernmental Organizations

Abstract: This paper analyzes, from a cross-national perspective, publicized incidents of wrongdoing by nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). A content analysis of media reports of "scandals" over the past four years involving NGOs was conducted to identify issues and trends in governance and management problems. The analysis is confined to NGOs that are involved in the financing and/or delivery of health and human services in order to facilitate comparisons. International and U.S. cases of wrongdoing, covering the gamu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
154
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
154
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beneficiaries from time to time call for NGOs to be more transparent and honest in delivering their objectives. Gibelman & Gelman [14] support the ongoing argument in their study which emphasized the idea that the public has a right to know about charitable behavior and to demand a high degree of accountability especially in cases when NGOs receive donations from the public [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beneficiaries from time to time call for NGOs to be more transparent and honest in delivering their objectives. Gibelman & Gelman [14] support the ongoing argument in their study which emphasized the idea that the public has a right to know about charitable behavior and to demand a high degree of accountability especially in cases when NGOs receive donations from the public [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many allegations of corruption and fraud have been leveled against NGOs across the globe. Gibelman and Gelman (2004) state that the wrongdoings of NGOs can be grouped into "six major categories of wrongdoing: personal life style enhancement, parallel enterprises, resource expansion opportunities, theft, mismanagement of resources, and support of activities and groups outside of the organization's purview" (p. 370). The board of directors of an NGO is the policy making body and the directors have a duty to act in the best interest of others; however, this fiduciary duty varies from country to country and even varies at the local jurisdiction level (Ibid.).…”
Section: Ethical and Cultural Dimensions Of Asdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We call the problem of asymmetric information in the context of donative nonprofits the fundraising problem. This problem is closely related to the problem of whether charities manage their funds wisely and efficiently, or the credibility problem (e.g., Gibelman and Gelman 2004;Ortmann and Schlesinger 2003). 1 We note that most of our arguments apply also to commercial nonprofits, which rely to a significant extent on income from selling their products, and, more generally, even to for-profits that provide experience or credence goods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…4 In rare occasions donations may come unsolicited. 5 This question addresses the wide-spread perception among donors that nonprofits, whether donative or commercial, are rather incompetent at spending money wisely and efficiently (e.g., Bradley, Jansen, and Silverman, 2003;Light, 2004Light, , 2004aGibelman and Gelman, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation