Bipolar/BiCMOS Circuits and Technology, 2004. Proceedings of the 2004 Meeting
DOI: 10.1109/bipol.2004.1365789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A low complexity 0.13 μ SiGe BiCMOS technology for wireless and mixed signal applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TO AN ALL-IMPLANTED COLLECTOR Different approaches can be considered to build a low-cost derivative of a SiGe BiCMOS technology, by simplifying either the emitter-base architecture [2] or the collector module [3]- [4]. We have shown that the self-alignment of the emitter-base system is a key advantage to reach state-of-the-art performances [5]- [6].…”
Section: From a Conventional Epitaxial Collectormentioning
confidence: 98%
“…TO AN ALL-IMPLANTED COLLECTOR Different approaches can be considered to build a low-cost derivative of a SiGe BiCMOS technology, by simplifying either the emitter-base architecture [2] or the collector module [3]- [4]. We have shown that the self-alignment of the emitter-base system is a key advantage to reach state-of-the-art performances [5]- [6].…”
Section: From a Conventional Epitaxial Collectormentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One of them was IBM's SiGe 8 WL technology, which is a cost-performance variant of the 130 nm node high-performance platform technology [10]. IBM 5AM [11], with peak cut-off frequency of 50 GHz, 0.5 SiGe process, was used for gamma irradiation.…”
Section: Devices and Test Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hardware used in this study came from two sets of IBM's highspeed 3 rd generation SiGe BiCMOS process. The first is a 130 nm, high-speed variant (IBM's 200GHz 8HP technology) labeled here "HP" for "high-performance," and the second is a scaled, lower cost version (IBM's 8WL technology) of the aforementioned technology and is labeled "CP" for "costperformance" [14]. Both total dose testing (X-ray and highenergy protons) and ion microprobe analysis were used for hardness qualification and the results are interpreted through full 3-D Technology Computer Aided Design (TCAD) simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%