A Machine Learning Ensemble Approach Based on Random Forest and Radial Basis Function Neural Network for Risk Evaluation of Regional Flood Disaster: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta, China

Abstract

The Yangtze River Delta (YRD) is one of the most developed regions in China. This is also a flood-prone area where flood disasters are frequently experienced; the situations between the people–land nexus and the people–water nexus are very complicated. Therefore, the accurate assessment of flood risk is of great significance to regional development. The paper took the YRD urban agglomeration as the research case. The driving force, pressure, state, impact and response (DPSIR) conceptual framework was established to analyze the indexes of flood disasters. The random forest (RF) algorithm was used to screen important indexes of floods risk, and a risk assessment model based on the radial basis function (RBF) neural network was constructed to evaluate the flood risk level in this region from 2009 to 2018. The risk map showed the I-V level of flood risk in the YRD urban agglomeration from 2016 to 2018 by using the geographic information system (GIS). Further analysis indicated that the indexes such as flood season rainfall, urban impervious area ratio, gross domestic product (GDP) per square kilometer of land, water area ratio, population density and emergency rescue capacity of public administration departments have important influence on flood risk. The flood risk has been increasing in the YRD urban agglomeration during the past ten years under the urbanization background, and economic development status showed a significant positive correlation with flood risks. In addition, there were serious differences in the rising rate of flood risks and the status quo among provinces. There are still a few cities that have stabilized at a better flood-risk level through urban flood control measures from 2016 to 2018. These results were basically in line with the actual situation, which validated the effectiveness of the model. Finally, countermeasures and suggestions for reducing the urban flood risk in the YRD region were proposed, in order to provide decision support for flood control, disaster reduction and emergency management in the YRD region.

Is the Random Forest Algorithm Suitable for Predicting Parkinson’s Disease with Mild Cognitive Impairment out of Parkinson’s Disease with Normal Cognition?

“…RF can be free from overfitting theoretically, and is not affected by noise or outliers much [20]. Moreover, it can generate high accuracy results by reducing generalization errors [20]. However, RF is more likely to have an elbow point, which means a steep drop in slope with more trees.…”

“…Random forests generate multiple decision trees by conducting random sampling on the same dataset and combining them to predict the target variable. Therefore, the accuracy of random forests is higher than that of decision trees [20,21]. Moreover, random forests can be used to explore the relationship between explanatory variables and diseases when many (types of) explanatory variables are applied to a random forest model [22].…”

Analysis and Modeling of Football Team’s Collaboration Mode and Performance Evaluation Using Network Science and BP Neural Network

“…First of all, team performance evaluation is a continuous function of many complex factors, and the change of each factor affects the overall performance of the team [37][38][39].…”

Forecasting of Landslide Displacement Using a Probability-Scheme Combination Ensemble Prediction Technique

“…Ensemble prediction, a state-of-the-art artificial intelligence technique, aims to improve prediction robustness and accuracy and uncertainty quantification [ 20 , 21 ]. Ensemble prediction has been successfully applied in a variety of fields, including prediction performance improvement and uncertainty quantification of remaining useful life [ 22 ], bankruptcy [ 23 ], shear capacity of reinforced-concrete deep beams [ 24 ], residential electricity consumption [ 25 ], wind power [ 26 ], flood susceptibility [ 27 , 28 ], and landslide susceptibility [ 29 ].…”