2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/bigdata50022.2020.9378453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Machine Learning fMRI Approach in the Diagnosis of Autism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the studies have utilized physiological FC features, with the exception of [42] that has also utilized sex, age, and IQs. Furthermore, most works utilize only sFC features; although, in our previous analysis [26], we additionally incorporated texture features to identify biological variables that might affect ASD identification, in an image-related analysis of the BOLD signals. On the contrary, in the proposed approach, we employ a more sophisticated method, by combining static and dynamic connectivity fused with non-physiological characteristics to investigate their associations towards automated autism detection.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Adopted Framework And Relationship To Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All the studies have utilized physiological FC features, with the exception of [42] that has also utilized sex, age, and IQs. Furthermore, most works utilize only sFC features; although, in our previous analysis [26], we additionally incorporated texture features to identify biological variables that might affect ASD identification, in an image-related analysis of the BOLD signals. On the contrary, in the proposed approach, we employ a more sophisticated method, by combining static and dynamic connectivity fused with non-physiological characteristics to investigate their associations towards automated autism detection.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Adopted Framework And Relationship To Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, an implementation of a multi-atlas classification scheme employing FC along with a neural network obtained 78.7% accuracy [25]. In our previous work [26], static FC and image-related features were incorporated (i.e., the Haralick texture features and the Kullback-Leibler divergence) to discriminate between ASD and TD individulars resulting in 72.5% accuracy. Our results demonstrated that additional characteristics, when applied to machine learning paradigms, can enhance classification performance and provide additional indicators of the autism-regulated mechanisms that govern brain functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have turned to machine learning over traditional statistical methods for data analysis due to the high prevalence rate and heterogeneous nature of ASD. Machine Learning techniques have been employed on various biomarkers in the field of ASD diagnosis of which Resting State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI) has come out as a potential biomarker [3], [4], [5]. Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging is a non-invasive brain imaging technique which uses blood-oxygenation-level dependent (BOLD) as a neurophysiologic indicator to measure brain activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By integrating the traditional functional connectivity network, the low-order dynamic functional connectivity network and features were extracted from the high-order dynamic functional connectivity network, and a linear kernel-based SVM classifier was used to obtain up to 83.00% accuracy in 45 ASD patients and 47 TCs. In the same year, Karampasi et al (2020) used the time series extracted by the CC200 atlas, demographic information, texture and divergence features of the BOLD signal as manually extracted features. Then, five feature selection algorithms such as recursive feature elimination with correlation bias reduction, local learning, infinite feature selection, minimum redundancy maximum correlation and Laplace score were used for feature selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%