2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/cvprw53098.2021.00370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mathematical Analysis of Learning Loss for Active Learning in Regression

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitative analysis. We use the same active learning experiment setup as in [8,47,48,57]. We conduct our experiments on human pose using two single person datasets: MPII [2] and LSP/LSPET [22,23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Quantitative analysis. We use the same active learning experiment setup as in [8,47,48,57]. We conduct our experiments on human pose using two single person datasets: MPII [2] and LSP/LSPET [22,23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayesian Neural Networks have been traditionally used to estimate uncertainty; however recent approaches [47,53] explore computing uncertainty using a single forward pass through the network. Empirical approach to estimate ambiguity of the model include Learning Loss [48,57] which similar to our approach uses an auxiliary neural network to predict the 'loss' for an unlabelled image. Approaches that measure model change include expected gradient length [45], which uses the model's gradient as a directly proportionate measure of informativeness.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Active learning (AL), which proactively selects the most informative unlabeled images to annotate, is one promising solution to this problem. Recent active learning-based pose estimation frameworks [38,58,4,5,22] can be categorized into uncertainty-based or distribution-based methods. The uncertainty-based methods [22,58,38] query annotations for the samples with the lowest confidence scores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent active learning-based pose estimation frameworks [38,58,4,5,22] can be categorized into uncertainty-based or distribution-based methods. The uncertainty-based methods [22,58,38] query annotations for the samples with the lowest confidence scores. However, as shown in [24], neural networks tend to be overconfident with unfamiliar samples, leading to overestimated model performance and therefore lowering the labeling efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%