1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01313056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A matrix approach to grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction in multilayers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Pauli energy of the pair density functional theory was introduced by a density functional analogy: the difference of the kinetic energy and a Weizsäcker-type expression 9 ͑constructed from the pair density instead of the density͒. The Pauli potential is the functional derivative of the Pauli energy with respect to the pair density.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pauli energy of the pair density functional theory was introduced by a density functional analogy: the difference of the kinetic energy and a Weizsäcker-type expression 9 ͑constructed from the pair density instead of the density͒. The Pauli potential is the functional derivative of the Pauli energy with respect to the pair density.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 In general, the sample rocking curve P GID (␦) and the position of the sample peak can be calculated numerically with the matrix method. 31,[39][40][41][42] For a periodic multilayer, there are many sample peaks at ⌽ h coinciding with different-order Bragg angles for the multilayer.…”
Section: ͑3͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference is that in one scheme ͓Fig. 1͑a͔͒ the incident beam is not collimated in the Bragg plane and the diffracted waves are analyzed depending on their takeoff angle to the surface, 2,5,10,[28][29][30][31] while in the other one ͓Fig. 1͑b͔͒ the incident beam is collimated in the Bragg plane and the dependence of diffracted beam intensity on deviation of the sample from the Bragg position 1,3,4,11,12 is studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This e ect has been widely used to study the oxidation kinetics of , for example, Si wafers (Awaji et al 1997, Takahashi et al 1998) and metals , Kellerman et al 1997, Stierle and Zabel 1997a . Indeed, the critical angle increases with increasing layer density, as shown in ® gure 1 (b), where the Fe layer has been substituted by a more dense W layer with the same thickness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the work of Sinha et al several other studies on the development of models and algorithms for calculating the scattering of X-rays at small angles have been published (Andre  and Pardo 1988, Stearns 1989, Bridou and Pardo 1994, Plotz and Lischka 1994, Sinha 1994, Stepanov et al 1995, Lu et al 1996, De Caro et al 1997, De Caro and Tapfer 1997, Voorma et al 1997 including non-specular re¯ectivity. Also the experimental aspects of XRR have been the subject of investigations aimed to develop XRR instrumentation for use at synchrotron radiation sources or combined with ultrahigh-vacuu m chambers (Niggemeier et al 1997, Lee andTseng 1998) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%