A MCDM Analysis of the Roşia Montană Gold Mining Project

Abstract

Abstract:The need and estimated utility for a structured analysis of the Roşia Montană gold exploitation project have been palpable in the Romanian public sphere during the last 15 years and there is a vast amount of conflicting information and opinions on the benefits and risks involved. This article provides a comprehensive decision analysis of the Roşia Montană project. Over 100 documents from the past years have been gathered regarding the Roşia Montană mining project, which cover the main official, formal and less formal documents covering the case and produced by a wide range of stakeholders. These were then analyzed while designing a multi-criteria tree including the relevant perspectives under which the most commonly discussed four alternatives were analyzed. The result of this can be translated into a valuable recommendation for the mining company and for the political decision-makers. If these stakeholders want the continuation of the project and its acceptance by civil society, the key challenge is to increase the transparency of the process and improve the credibility and legal aspects; if these aspects cannot be met, the decision-makers need to pay attention to the alternatives available for a sustainable development in the area. OPEN ACCESSSustainability 2015, 7 7262

An Agent Based Model to Analyze the Bitcoin Mining Activity and a Comparison with the Gold Mining Industry

“…For example, there is an increasing concern for the health of miners and mining communities related to the mercury exposure, a toxic metal used in small-scale gold mining, and for the ecosystems' degradation due to mining land use [8,9]. Therefore, looking at the total mining costs, such as production costs, economic costs, environmental costs, and social costs, of these two assets or "safe havens", probably a wide spread of Bitcoin could allow us to better address the environmental aspects of sustainability and to have substantially higher savings than gold [8][9][10][11][12].…”

Prospects of Agrarian Populism and Food Sovereignty Movement in Post‐Socialist Romania

“…In turn, regional disparities between rural and urban areas deepened (Goschin 2014). Besides that, there has been increased multinational interest in direct investments in the Romanian agricultural and mining sectors (Mihai et al 2015; Hajdu and Visser 2017). Arable land investments have resulted in re‐cultivation of abandoned land, improvements in farming technologies, and increased domestic agricultural output (Csáki and Jámbor 2013).…”

“…They also resulted in the presence of a variety of farmland investors with speculative objectives (Hajdu and Visser 2017). The investments in the mining sector are expected to boost tax revenues in the federal budget and contribute to local employment and business opportunities (Mihai et al 2015). However, the investments are often described as ‘land grabbing’ or ‘resource grabbing’ because of their negative impact on local communities and the environment (see Vesalon and Creţan 2012, 2013, 2015; Mihai et al 2015 on the impact of mining and fracking in the Romanian countryside).…”

“…‘Save Rosia Montana’ became Romania’s largest and longest environmental and social campaign. It was a campaign against the development of an open‐pit mine initiated by a Canadian company for the mining of gold deposits (Ştefănescu et al 2013; Vesalon and Creţan 2013; Mihai et al 2015). Eco Ruralis was established by four peasants from Mures, Sibiu, Cluj and Alba counties in Romania together with two volunteers from the USA.…”

Assessment of Sustainable Regional Development Policies: A Case Study of Jambi Province, Indonesia

“…Some of these include Mihai, Marincea, and Ekenberg (2015) on choosing the sustainable mining policy in Romania and Kivunike, Ekenberg, Danielson, and Tusubira (2015) on sustainable health care provision in Uganda. This study, therefore, is the first one to implement the IDM technique in the context of sustainable regional development.…”