2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A media framing analysis of a U.S. presidential advisor: Alternative flacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In relation to PR practitioners-journalists relations, Framing theory was used to provoke a discussion about the role of silence and invisibility in public relations (Rettig & Avraham, 2015). A study conducted framing analysis to understand how journalists framed PR professionals' occupational role and job performance (Lambert, 2018). Based on the implications of future application of "Framing theory" in PR, Anderson (2018) article seeks to introduce the counter-framing concept to public relations to help scholars examine the democratic environment accurately where competitive debate is excepted.…”
Section: Stakeholder Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relation to PR practitioners-journalists relations, Framing theory was used to provoke a discussion about the role of silence and invisibility in public relations (Rettig & Avraham, 2015). A study conducted framing analysis to understand how journalists framed PR professionals' occupational role and job performance (Lambert, 2018). Based on the implications of future application of "Framing theory" in PR, Anderson (2018) article seeks to introduce the counter-framing concept to public relations to help scholars examine the democratic environment accurately where competitive debate is excepted.…”
Section: Stakeholder Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies on media framing are approached in two ways; by exploring the content of news (frame building) and examining the effect news has on the audience (frame setting) (de Vreese, 2005;Lecheler & De Vreese, 2019;Lukyanova, 2018;Thankachan & Thomas, 2021). Regarding frame building, a plethora of empirical studies have been conducted exploring the media's framing of issues such as public health (Chiang et al, 2020;Kenterelidou, 2012;Ogbodo et al,2020); politics, elections and politicians (Araujo & Prior, 2021;Lambert, 2018;Groshek & Al-Rawi, 2013); environmental issues (Bowe et al, 2014;Olsen, & Osmundsen, 2017;Weathers, & Kendall, 2016); social movements (Mendes, 2011;Sheoin, 2013) and conflict/war (Vladisacljevic & Voltmer, 2017;Atanesyan, 2020;Makhortykh & Sydorova, 2017). Other studies (Andersson, 2022;Anipah, 2017;Thuo, 2012) have also addressed generic issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%