A method to align functionalities of a manufacturing execution system with competitive priorities

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to align the implementation of the manufacturing execution systems (MES) functionalities with the manufacturing competitive dimensions of two companies of the metal-mechanics industry. Design/methodology/approach The research object comprises two Brazilian manufacturers that use MES. The research method is quantitative modeling. A literature review organized 24 functionalities of MES. The study prioritized the functionalities and the manufacturing competitive dimensions, evaluated the contribution and the quality of the implementation and classified the functionalities. Findings Two functionalities in the first and five in the second case have high contribution and quality. Three functionalities in the first and six in the second case have low contribution and quality. The first group should be more explored and updated. The second should be discontinued. The rest has intermediate graduations and should be studied case-by-case. The main contribution of the paper is the method, which can be replicated in other applications in the same or in other industries. Research limitations/implications The study relies on two case studies of the same industry. Further research shall encompass the entire industry and cases in industries others than the metal-mechanics. Practical implications MES users and vendors may benefit from the study as they can apply the method to align the implementation with the manufacturing strategy and therefore enhance the effectivity of the system. Originality/value The authors did not find a study that associates the performance or the contribution of the MES functionalities to the competitive priorities with the quality, integrity or consistency of the implementation.

An Empirical Study of Drivers, Barriers, and Cost Efficiency of Information Systems in Greek Industry

“…This is the reason why information-derived either from the internal or the external business environment-is considered to be the most valuable source the companies have available. Good information management can be proved to be crucial to their existence and prosperity as it helps the administration to adapt to strategies, avoid threats, utilize opportunities, change decisions, and effectively manage all the core and supportive company operations [1][2][3]. Globalization has increased the abundance of information being shared within the organizations along with the existing complexity and competitiveness rapidly.…”

“…IT can be considered a critical factor in supply chain (SC) as they contribute not only to the performance of an independent enterprise but also to the SC as a whole. One of the critical elements companies can develop through the effective use of IT in the SCM is competitive advantage [2,[11][12][13][14]. There are several types of IS that can be used to support logistics management such as: enterprise resource planning-ERP, warehouse management systems-WMS, transportation management systems-TMS, and other related technologies (barcode, electronic data interchange, etc.)…”

The after-sales strategy of an industrial equipment manufacturer: evaluation and control

“…The prioritization of indicators relied on the balance between importance and performance (important indicators require high performance). According to Sellitto and Vargas (2019), in the manufacturing strategy, a usual assumption first highlighted by Slack (1991Slack ( , 1994 is that the gap between importance and performance should be 0. Therefore, strategic control actions should reallocate resources from low importance, high performance to high important, low-performance indicators.…”

Theoretical framework for strategic productivity in manufacturing: the primary transformation model (PTM)

“…The cost, as a competitive priority, is composed by initial cost, operating cost and maintenance cost (Garvin, 1993; Sellitto and Vargas, 2020). The operating and maintenance costs do not fluctuate according to manufacturing performance, since they are defined in previous phases.…”