Proceedings of the 2008 Conference of the Center for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research Meeting of Minds - CASCON '08 2008
DOI: 10.1145/1463788.1463806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A methodological leg to stand on

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We do not claim the results to be universally applicable: rather, they accurately characterize the context studied [1]. Our choice of research destinations and participants were limited in some ways by our access to them.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We do not claim the results to be universally applicable: rather, they accurately characterize the context studied [1]. Our choice of research destinations and participants were limited in some ways by our access to them.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Since the codes, concepts, and category emerged directly from the data, which in turn was collected directly from real world, the results are grounded in the context of the data [1]. We do not claim the results to be universally applicable: rather, they accurately characterize the context studied [1].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Both approaches were still termed grounded theory, which has confused scholars (e.g. Adolph, Hall, and Kruchten 2008). A known derivative of this foundational work is constructivist grounded theory by Charmaz (2008), which differs from the epistemic position of the original work (see Glaser 2002a).…”
Section: Conceptualization á La Grounded Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, this article does not claim that its findings are universal, because its access to appropriate resources was limited to the participants that voluntarily had attended to this research. But, it claims that its findings describe and characterize the area under study [58]. However, the inherent limitation of GT is that the emerged theory is only grounded in the particular contexts investigated in the research [58].…”
Section: Limitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, it claims that its findings describe and characterize the area under study [58]. However, the inherent limitation of GT is that the emerged theory is only grounded in the particular contexts investigated in the research [58].…”
Section: Limitationmentioning
confidence: 99%