2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for evaluating the configuration and dispatch of PV plus battery power plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Fu et al (2018b) present PV+battery costs based on a constant DC capacity rating (e.g., PV panels or array size; Figure 3), which means both the costs and values will differ between the independent and hybrid systems considered. However, their findings are often used to support statements about the cost savings associated with hybridization more generally (Hledik et al 2019;Gramlich, Goggin, and Burwen 2019), which cannot be decoupled from corresponding changes in value (Gorman et al 2020;DiOrio, Denholm, and Hobbs 2020;Schleifer et al 2021). Determining the cost-optimal design of a PV+battery system further requires considering these configuration-dependent costs on a life-cycle basis, which accounts for equipment replacement costs that depend on how the plant will be operated; technology costs as a function of time; the probability of component failures over time (NREL et al 2018); and policy drivers.…”
Section: Cost Synergiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Fu et al (2018b) present PV+battery costs based on a constant DC capacity rating (e.g., PV panels or array size; Figure 3), which means both the costs and values will differ between the independent and hybrid systems considered. However, their findings are often used to support statements about the cost savings associated with hybridization more generally (Hledik et al 2019;Gramlich, Goggin, and Burwen 2019), which cannot be decoupled from corresponding changes in value (Gorman et al 2020;DiOrio, Denholm, and Hobbs 2020;Schleifer et al 2021). Determining the cost-optimal design of a PV+battery system further requires considering these configuration-dependent costs on a life-cycle basis, which accounts for equipment replacement costs that depend on how the plant will be operated; technology costs as a function of time; the probability of component failures over time (NREL et al 2018); and policy drivers.…”
Section: Cost Synergiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PV+battery costs have been explored through bottom-up cost modeling (Fu, Remo, and Margolis 2018b) and reported power purchase agreement prices for select configurations (Bolinger, Seel, and Robson 2019). PV+battery value is most-often evaluated via site-level or project-level energy analysis based on price-taker analysis that maximizes revenue for the plant owner (Denholm, Margolis, and Eichman 2017;Gorman et al 2020;DiOrio, Denholm, and Hobbs 2020;Schleifer et al 2021). Green squares indicate PV+battery deployments, where the size of the square scales with the solar capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy storage frequency regulation includes the primary frequency regulation and the secondary frequency regulation [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], which supports the grid against disturbances and faults. Storage could correct over and under frequency, prevent black-outs and costly equipment damage due to its fast response times and high flexibility.…”
Section: A Frequency Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple distinct architectures have emerged in solar plus storage system design, each of which has advantages and disadvantages. Recent analysis on solar plus storage configuration cost, operation, and value has been completed (Fu, Remo, and Margolis 2018;DiOrio et al 2020;Denholm et al 2017).…”
Section: Solar Pv Plus Storagementioning
confidence: 99%