2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for predicting the potential diffusion of solar energy systems in complex urban environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The set of results previously reported confirms the difficulty of an effective renewables policy in cities and, by extension, the inadequacy of planning tools for the urban development of RES that are focused solely on each single form of energy. Those kinds of tools, as discussed in Oludunsin et al [95] for biomass, in La Gennusa et al [96] for solar energy, in Ishugah et al [97] for wind energy, in Tkáč and Vranayová [98] for small-scale water energy systems, or for other RES technologies, are considered meaningful for assessing the potential of a specific renewable source, but their territorial outcomes are not consciously understood. In fact, urban energy planning requires integrated scenarios quite difficult to foresee: according to literature, this category of tools can be helpful but needs to be integrated in an all-encompassing way, through the combined use of planning methods and a higher-level governance system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set of results previously reported confirms the difficulty of an effective renewables policy in cities and, by extension, the inadequacy of planning tools for the urban development of RES that are focused solely on each single form of energy. Those kinds of tools, as discussed in Oludunsin et al [95] for biomass, in La Gennusa et al [96] for solar energy, in Ishugah et al [97] for wind energy, in Tkáč and Vranayová [98] for small-scale water energy systems, or for other RES technologies, are considered meaningful for assessing the potential of a specific renewable source, but their territorial outcomes are not consciously understood. In fact, urban energy planning requires integrated scenarios quite difficult to foresee: according to literature, this category of tools can be helpful but needs to be integrated in an all-encompassing way, through the combined use of planning methods and a higher-level governance system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This correction factor is smaller than 1 (La Gennusa et al, 2011), and therefore, not taking it into account overestimates the effect of the shadow, and the irradiation received by the panels, in other words, the energy generated. Over the year this correction is secondary, because it is non-zero only in the early hours of the day and in the evening, especially in the winter when the PV panels produce just a small fraction of the total annual electricity.…”
Section: Panel Layout Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The energetic producibility of RES plants, and the convenience to integrate solar energy panels in urban contexts with high building density, must be evaluated taking into account: (i) the typology, slope, aspect, and useful surface of the roofs [13,17,35]; (ii) the theoretical energy production of solar panels; (iii) the economic analysis (i.e., the payback time) according to the real energetic needs of users (e.g., single apartments, condominiums, and blocks) [19]. Firstly, it is necessary to analyze the roofs typology based on morphology and building materials.…”
Section: The Urban Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further models provide issues related to orientation and shape of solar energy panels [16,17] in order to maximize the production of solar energy [18]. Cellura et al [19] evaluated the relationship between the surface of the rooftops and the height of the buildings, providing a first tool to analyze the influence of the density of the built environment on the availability of solar energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%