2015 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/cec.2015.7257315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified choice function hyper-heuristic controlling unary and binary operators

Abstract: Abstract-Hyper-heuristics are a class of high-level search methodologies which operate on a search space of low-level heuristics or components, rather than on solutions directly. Traditional iterative selection hyper-heuristics rely on two key components, a heuristic selection method and a move acceptance criterion. Choice Function heuristic selection scores heuristics based on a combination of three measures, selecting the heuristic with the highest score. Modified Choice Function heuristic selection is a var… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The chosen heuristics logically form a chain of a heuristic sequence as the search progresses. Although there are previous studies ( [9], [48], [57], [58], [59]) using some notion of transition probabilities to keep track of the performance of heuristics invoked successively, none of them employed the same reinforcement learning scheme as we proposed. More importantly, all the previously mentioned algorithms were tested on single objective optimisation problems under a single point based search framework managing move operators rather than metaheuristics.…”
Section: B Reinforcement Learning Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chosen heuristics logically form a chain of a heuristic sequence as the search progresses. Although there are previous studies ( [9], [48], [57], [58], [59]) using some notion of transition probabilities to keep track of the performance of heuristics invoked successively, none of them employed the same reinforcement learning scheme as we proposed. More importantly, all the previously mentioned algorithms were tested on single objective optimisation problems under a single point based search framework managing move operators rather than metaheuristics.…”
Section: B Reinforcement Learning Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An improved choice function hyper-heuristics is proposed in (Drake et al, 2012) showing that this approach is more successful than the traditional choice function heuristic selection. Drake et al (2015) extended this previous study introducing crossover operators into the set of low level heuristics and a mechanism to control the input those binary operators, which slightly improved the overall performance of the hyper-heuristic. An adaptive iterated local search approach is proposed and applied on HyFlex problem domains in (Burke et al, 2011;Ochoa et al, 2012b).…”
Section: Hyflexmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…(v) Peckish selection follows the same strategy as the greedy selection, but a subset of low-level heuristics is considered instead of all low-level heuristics (see Chakhlevitch 2003, 2007) and, (vi) Reinforcement Learning heuristic selection is based on a reward value for each heuristic. Such type of reward that represents its historical performance has been considered by Özcan et al (2012), Drake et al (2015), and Aron et al (2015).…”
Section: Hyper-heuristic For Csaphlrpmentioning
confidence: 99%