2013 Spanish Conference on Electron Devices 2013
DOI: 10.1109/cde.2013.6481371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Monte Carlo Study of electron transport in suspended monolayer graphene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 shows the average time between scatterings for silicene for the electric field up to 40 kV cm −1 . It is interesting to take note that the scattering time for silicene is about 50 times lower than graphene [29]. While silicene on Al 2 O 3 does not exhibit a clear saturation value for the scattering time, the average time between scatterings for suspended silicene starts to saturate at 25.6 fs which corresponds to the mean free path of 13 Å.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Figure 6 shows the average time between scatterings for silicene for the electric field up to 40 kV cm −1 . It is interesting to take note that the scattering time for silicene is about 50 times lower than graphene [29]. While silicene on Al 2 O 3 does not exhibit a clear saturation value for the scattering time, the average time between scatterings for suspended silicene starts to saturate at 25.6 fs which corresponds to the mean free path of 13 Å.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In figure 2 the saturation velocity (considered at 40 kV cm −1 ) and the peak velocity (maximum velocity in the applied field range considered) are also shown. Contrarily to the case of graphene [16], in this context the negative differential resistance cannot be attributed to the conical shape of the conduction band. The abrupt treatment of the scattering relaxing time in the hard cutoff description implies a threshold energy v 2 th 0 F 0  e e p l = = for the activation of this mechanism.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Such an approach could lead to coarse approximations; for example, for a correct simulation of transport behavior of graphene when thermal effects are considered, the out-ofplane Z-phonons have to be included as a distinct population because, although they do not directly interact with electrons, their thermal inertia, particularly for the flexural acoustic ZA phonons, is not negligible [12,13,14,15,16,17]. However, the isotropic approximation, for which the in-plane acoustic and optical phonons are considered as a unique population, is often accepted for simulations (see for example [5,18,19,20,21,22,23,24], and references therein), and an exhaustive analysis of the implications of such a hypothesis is not present, at best of our knowledge, in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 we show mean electron energy and velocity obtained with the previous two definitions of local equilibrium temperature but by using constant relaxation times τ µ = 1.5 ps, except for ZA phonons which maintain their already used relaxation time to avoid the introduction of a)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%