2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-12255-3_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multicriteria View About Judicial and Legislative Decision Making in Digital Cities and Societies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, there have been efforts in bringing more proximity between government and citizens [84][85][86]. Connected by a new era of information technologies, the SC drives a strong trend for decentralizing democracies [87], as mentioned by Roberts (2004) [88]. Decentralizing the decision-making process implies distributing decisions, a strategy that has been mainly adopted using the paradigm of Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) [89,90] concepts.…”
Section: Decentralized Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this sense, there have been efforts in bringing more proximity between government and citizens [84][85][86]. Connected by a new era of information technologies, the SC drives a strong trend for decentralizing democracies [87], as mentioned by Roberts (2004) [88]. Decentralizing the decision-making process implies distributing decisions, a strategy that has been mainly adopted using the paradigm of Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) [89,90] concepts.…”
Section: Decentralized Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is expected, in terms of democratic innovation, is a shared decision-making process that means expanding the civil autonomy and public relations [100]. This provides space for e-government [101], and even possibilities of Internet voting [102,103], legislative and juridical decision-making [87,104] and public petitioning.…”
Section: Decentralized Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these changes have potential to strengthen open spaces for discussions and to increase the number of citizens interested in participating in web politics [17]. Coelho et al [18] described a system that could handle legislative and judicial processes with social participation throughout a multi-criteria analysis of all persons involved in the process. However, no work from the literature has yet tackled how this modern concept of digital interaction can be boosted in a direct way to motivate society to handle the economic aspects of the current political administration.…”
Section: Internet and The Rise Of E-governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phenomenon of the creation of apps and online services by individuals also spreads to the legal profession with the diffusion of apps and online technologies that are ideated by lawyers for justice professionals and citizens (Hamm 2013;Gershowitz 2019). The development of legal technology conceived by lawyers enriches the justice environment with more and more diffusion of increasingly complex technology, such as artificial intelligence systems, smart contracts, digital identity, and blockchain systems for supporting justice professionals (Coelho et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%