A National Prediction Model for PM_2.5Component Exposures and Measurement Error–Corrected Health Effect Inference

Abstract

Background: Studies estimating health effects of long-term air pollution exposure often use a two-stage approach: building exposure models to assign individual-level exposures, which are then used in regression analyses. This requires accurate exposure modeling and careful treatment of exposure measurement error.Objective: To illustrate the importance of accounting for exposure model characteristics in two-stage air pollution studies, we considered a case study based on data from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).Methods: We built national spatial exposure models that used partial least squares and universal kriging to estimate annual average concentrations of four PM2.5 components: elemental carbon (EC), organic carbon (OC), silicon (Si), and sulfur (S). We predicted PM2.5 component exposures for the MESA cohort and estimated cross-sectional associations with carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), adjusting for subject-specific covariates. We corrected for measurement error using recently developed methods that account for the spatial structure of predicted exposures.Results: Our models performed well, with cross-validated R2 values ranging from 0.62 to 0.95. Naïve analyses that did not account for measurement error indicated statistically significant associations between CIMT and exposure to OC, Si, and S. EC and OC exhibited little spatial correlation, and the corrected inference was unchanged from the naïve analysis. The Si and S exposure surfaces displayed notable spatial correlation, resulting in corrected confidence intervals (CIs) that were 50% wider than the naïve CIs, but that were still statistically significant.Conclusion: The impact of correcting for measurement error on health effect inference is concordant with the degree of spatial correlation in the exposure surfaces. Exposure model characteristics must be considered when performing two-stage air pollution epidemiologic analyses because naïve health effect inference may be inappropriate.Citation: Bergen S, Sheppard L, Sampson PD, Kim SY, Richards M, Vedal S, Kaufman JD, Szpiro AA. 2013. A national prediction model for PM2.5 component exposures and measurement error–corrected health effect inference. Environ Health Perspect 121:1017–1025; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1206010

Application and validation of a line-source dispersion model to estimate small scale traffic-related particulate matter concentrations across the conterminous US

“…In comparison to previous studies, the spatial distribution of long-term mean predicted PM 2.5 EC in Fig. 4 is broadly similar to that presented in Bergen et al (2013). Also, consistent with results in Wilton et al (2010), we found that including ADMS-Roads output on smaller, lesser trafficked A4/A6 roads did not improve predictive accuracy of the spatio-temporal PM 2.5 EC model.…”

Long-term particulate matter exposure: Attributing health effects to individual PM components

“…The issue of measurement error was the subject of a comment by the NPACT Review Panel, which was concerned that the effects of EC could be underestimated. Bergen et al (2013) considered measurement error in the smaller cohort analyzed by Vedal et al They corrected for measurement error using new methods that account for the spatial patterns of predicted exposures. The only significant change identified after consideration of this issue was the emergence of Si as being significantly associated with the subclinical markers.…”

Analysis of Aerosol Properties in Beijing Based on Ground-Based Sun Photometer and Air Quality Monitoring Observations from 2005 to 2014

“…Aerosol is an important component of the atmosphere that affects the environment [1][2][3], weather [4], climate [5] and even human health [6][7][8]. Thus, monitoring aerosol properties via both ground-based observations and satellite observations has become important [4,9,10].…”