2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A naturalistic longitudinal study of at-risk mental state with a 2.4 year follow-up at a specialized clinic setting in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
46
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This rate is now considered as typical of prodromal research in general (Niendam et al, 2013;Yaakub et al, 2013;Katsura et al, 2014) and similar to the conversion rates in various consortia, such as the European Prediction of Psychosis Study (Salokangas et al, 2012). These rates reflect a decline in conversion since the time of the original reports in CHR samples (Yung et al, 2007).…”
Section: Neural Dysfunction In Cognitive Control Circuits T Colibazzisupporting
confidence: 65%
“…This rate is now considered as typical of prodromal research in general (Niendam et al, 2013;Yaakub et al, 2013;Katsura et al, 2014) and similar to the conversion rates in various consortia, such as the European Prediction of Psychosis Study (Salokangas et al, 2012). These rates reflect a decline in conversion since the time of the original reports in CHR samples (Yung et al, 2007).…”
Section: Neural Dysfunction In Cognitive Control Circuits T Colibazzisupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Supplementary [40,59,60,112,113,132,133]. Baseline CHR sample sizes ranged from seven [60] to 817 [77] including altogether 4952 CHR subjects.…”
Section: Included Studies and Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, 'disorganized speech' was the only positive item distinguishing converters (13.2%, mainly within 1 year) from non-converters in a 14-35-year-old UHR sample with a 2.4-year-followup (Katsura et al, 2014). Furthermore, 'disorganized communication' was the sole predictor of psychosis in a UHR sample (12-30-year-olds) with a 26% conversion rate at 2.5-year follow-up, and suggested as a potential endophenotype or stable trait marker for schizophrenia risk (DeVylder et al, 2014).…”
Section: Conversion To Psychosis At One-year Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%