2021
DOI: 10.31275/20212237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Case of Scientific Dishonesty in the Field of Parapsychology

Abstract: The present article informs about a case of prolonged scientific dishonesty in the field of parapsychology. It emerged that Alejandro Parra, an active member of the parapsychological community since about three decades, has published substantially plagiarized books and articles since at least 2007. Currently, I am aware of 20 publications that contain plagiarized sections or consist almost entirely of plagiarism. In the following, I present striking examples of such plagiarized texts and provide background inf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…She stated then that this was not the final analysis, with corrections and changes still to be made, such as resolving the rater discrepancies and analysis with z-score as an outcome. After the conference and study selection was assumed to be final, numerous reports in the Journal of Scientific Exploration reported the serious fraudulent actions and widespread plagiarism conducted by Alejandro Parra (Braude, 2021;Cardeña, 2021;Nahm, 2021).…”
Section: • Number Of Participants • Number Of Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She stated then that this was not the final analysis, with corrections and changes still to be made, such as resolving the rater discrepancies and analysis with z-score as an outcome. After the conference and study selection was assumed to be final, numerous reports in the Journal of Scientific Exploration reported the serious fraudulent actions and widespread plagiarism conducted by Alejandro Parra (Braude, 2021;Cardeña, 2021;Nahm, 2021).…”
Section: • Number Of Participants • Number Of Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%