2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-017-0581-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new cutting depth model with rapid calibration in abrasive water jet machining of titanium alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[23][24][25][26][27] With respect to the processing mechanism, the abrasive flow in the abrasive water jet polishing and abrasive flow machining methods has a strong impact or high viscosity by exerting a strong jet force or squeeze pressure, in which the workpiece surface is strongly cut by the abrasive particles. [28][29][30] In this article, the abrasive flow in these processing methods is referred to as ''hard'' abrasive flow. Although the processing method of using ''hard'' abrasive flow has high processing efficiency, it is difficult to get the satisfactory surface roughness because it may leave clear and directional machining marks on the surface of the workpiece by the strong circulation and strong pressure reciprocation to drive abrasive flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25][26][27] With respect to the processing mechanism, the abrasive flow in the abrasive water jet polishing and abrasive flow machining methods has a strong impact or high viscosity by exerting a strong jet force or squeeze pressure, in which the workpiece surface is strongly cut by the abrasive particles. [28][29][30] In this article, the abrasive flow in these processing methods is referred to as ''hard'' abrasive flow. Although the processing method of using ''hard'' abrasive flow has high processing efficiency, it is difficult to get the satisfactory surface roughness because it may leave clear and directional machining marks on the surface of the workpiece by the strong circulation and strong pressure reciprocation to drive abrasive flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These prediction models have a good correlation with the experimental measurements (error < 10%) and can be easily calibrated thanks to few tests. Similar models have been developed for titanium AWJ machining [23,24] and the maximum depth of cut as well as the whole trench or pocket profiles have been properly predicted (error < 5% for [24]). It is important to mention that empirical or analytical models seem to be the most suitable prediction method for an industrial use due to its simple and fast calibration and usage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The choice of the variable parameters is the conclusion drawn from a review concerning milling with AWJ. It was shown that the water jet pressure, the traverse speed and the scan step are the most influent parameters on the pocket's geometry [7,15,24,26,27]. In this case, four levels of pressure were selected as this parameter was found to be the most influent on the depth of cut [7,24,27].…”
Section: Abrasive Water Jet Milling Machine and Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of the high feed speed acceleration and deceleration procedures of the manufacturing machine have to be considered for this operation [11]. To quickly design AWJ milling operations, van Bui et al [12] have suggested the use of the Gaussian curve and its superposition to describe the material removal of the operation. Although a lot of fundamental and application knowledge about AWJ milling operations has been achieved [13], the application of the technology for industrial purposes is limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%