Ion Implantation: Equipment and Techniques 1983
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-69156-0_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Facility for Ion Beam Surface Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…34 The published data imply that, within the range of fluences studied, the surface moves at a constant rate u: = -0.78 x cm3. Owing to the high energy we can set m0 = l. 33 Inserting these numbers and the previously quoted atomic volumes in Eqn (6) we get Yo = 0.21 Si atoms per 0 atom, in very good agreement with the interpolated curve in Fig.…”
Section: Inspection Ofmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…34 The published data imply that, within the range of fluences studied, the surface moves at a constant rate u: = -0.78 x cm3. Owing to the high energy we can set m0 = l. 33 Inserting these numbers and the previously quoted atomic volumes in Eqn (6) we get Yo = 0.21 Si atoms per 0 atom, in very good agreement with the interpolated curve in Fig.…”
Section: Inspection Ofmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[2][3][4][5] Whereas "early" high-dose SIMOX had similar implant energy and dose to "contemporary" high-dose material, the structure and electrical properties differ dramatically because of a decade of progress in equipment, processing conditions, and understanding of the material. [2][3][4][5] Whereas "early" high-dose SIMOX had similar implant energy and dose to "contemporary" high-dose material, the structure and electrical properties differ dramatically because of a decade of progress in equipment, processing conditions, and understanding of the material.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%