2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8cc8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Fokker–Planck Approach for the Relaxation-driven Evolution of Galactic Nuclei

Abstract: We present an approach for simulating the collisional evolution of spherical isotropic stellar systems based on the one-dimensional Fokker-Planck equation. A novel aspect is that we use the phase volume as the argument of the distribution function, instead of the traditionally used energy, which facilitates the solution. The publicly available code, PhaseFlow, implements a high-accuracy finite-element method for the Fokker-Planck equation, and can handle multiple-component systems, optionally with the central … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
92
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If additional kinematic information is available, a two-integral DF f (E, L z ) may be computed instead (Magorrian and Tremaine 1999), which will selfconsistently account for the impact of flattening and orbital anisotropy on TDE rates. The simple procedure outlined above has repeatedly been used to compute TDE rates in large galaxy samples, and at this point can be performed with the publicly available Fokker-Planck code PhaseFlow (Vasiliev 2017), as was done in, e.g. Pfister et al (2019).…”
Section: Simple Phase Space Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If additional kinematic information is available, a two-integral DF f (E, L z ) may be computed instead (Magorrian and Tremaine 1999), which will selfconsistently account for the impact of flattening and orbital anisotropy on TDE rates. The simple procedure outlined above has repeatedly been used to compute TDE rates in large galaxy samples, and at this point can be performed with the publicly available Fokker-Planck code PhaseFlow (Vasiliev 2017), as was done in, e.g. Pfister et al (2019).…”
Section: Simple Phase Space Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time averages are taken between t = 100P and the end of the simulation. This is done to allow the disk a secular time to relax, as the TDEs do not begin to happen until after one secular time.5 The disruption and capture rates are ∼ 6 × 10 −5 and 5 × 10 −7 per year Vasiliev (2017). gives 5 × 10 −6 for the latter, but this is actually the mass of black holes (in solar units) that are consumed per year(Vasiliev, personal communication).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To perform the simulations of the UFDGs, we use Phase-Flow (Vasiliev 2017), which is part of the publicly available software library Agama (Vasiliev 2019). PhaseFlow dynamically evolves a given spherically symmetric system consisting of one or more collisional components (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its low computational cost allows us to perform the large sets of simulations required for the exploration of the input parameters using MCMC. Additionally, PhaseFlow is well tested in the context of nuclear star clusters (Generozov et al 2018;Emami & Loeb 2019a,b), Bahcall-Wolf cusps (Bahcall & Wolf 1976;Vasiliev 2017), and monochromatic PBH mass functions (Zhu et al 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%