1993
DOI: 10.7901/2169-3358-1993-1-507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Laboratory Method for Evaluating Oil Spill Dispersants

Abstract: A new dispersant effectiveness test, named EXDET, was developed to address certain concerns associated with currently available laboratory dispersant effectiveness test procedures. This new procedure uses standard laboratory equipment (such as a Burrell Wrist-Action Shaker) and small volumes of water, oil, and chemical dispersant. Other features include the capabilities to mass balance the dispersed and non-dispersed oil, and to generate replicate data for statistical analysis. Details of the new procedure are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Each value is an average percent effectiveness measured in an EXDET. 2 COREXIT® 9500 with calcium chloride solution added.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 Each value is an average percent effectiveness measured in an EXDET. 2 COREXIT® 9500 with calcium chloride solution added.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Exxon Dispersant Effectiveness Test (EXDET) was used to evaluate dispersant performance. Becker et al (1991Becker et al ( . 1993 contains a detailed description of the EXDET method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several laboratory protocols have been developed for testing the relative efficacy of different dispersants: the air current test (Mackay et al 1978 ), the Warren Springs rolling flask test (Martinelli 1984 ), the swirling flask test (Clayton et al 1993 ), the Exxon dispersant effectiveness test (Becker et al 1993 ), and the baffled flask test (Venosa et al 2002 ) among others. Comparisons of these tests with field and tank data have been reported by Clark et al ( 2005 ), and the baffled flask test was used to compare eight potential dispersants during the response to the Deepwater Horizon spill (Venosa and Holder 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the dozens of years, many laboratory tests have been developed for assessing the effectiveness of the chemical dispersant, which have the advantages of simply, low cost and well controlled. Such as the SFT [10] and BFT [11][12][13] used by USEPA, EXDET test [14], WSL test [15], MNS test [16] and IFP test [17]. Many researchers have used one or more test methods to measure the effectiveness of dispersants.…”
Section: Effectiveness Test Methods Of Chemical Dispersantmentioning
confidence: 99%