2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10765-007-0351-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Method for the Quantification and Correction of Thermal Effects on the Realization of Fixed Points

Abstract: The temperature and flatness (shape) of a fixed-point plateau depend on both the amount and nature of specific impurities and on thermal effects that are influenced by the fixed-point cell design and furnace properties. A better understanding and experimental proof of the influence of specific impurities on fixed-point realizations require the separation of impurity influences from thermal effects. In this paper the influence of heat exchange between the thermometer and furnace is quantified via a method based… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The 1.5 µK uncertainty due to the hydrostatic pressure is determined by the product of half the calculated liquid height within the cell and the temperature variation with depth of the neon triple-point temperature (1.9 mK·m -1 ) [1]. The uncertainty due to stray heat flux is estimated from the sensitivity of the plateau temperature to changes in the control set-point of the cryostat shield near the fixed-point cell [13]. Ne sample.…”
Section: Measurement Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1.5 µK uncertainty due to the hydrostatic pressure is determined by the product of half the calculated liquid height within the cell and the temperature variation with depth of the neon triple-point temperature (1.9 mK·m -1 ) [1]. The uncertainty due to stray heat flux is estimated from the sensitivity of the plateau temperature to changes in the control set-point of the cryostat shield near the fixed-point cell [13]. Ne sample.…”
Section: Measurement Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a poor fixed-point initiation is evident in a slow recovery from recalescence and from sensitivity to the furnace temperature, there are no guidelines or criteria for the development of initiation procedures. The furnace oscillation test [26] provides a good test of the completeness of the phase boundary, but the test has not yet been applied to the evaluation of different initiation procedures.…”
Section: Initiation Of Freezing Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires the lowest possible uncertainties on a level of 0.2 mK or better. It is based on slim fixed-point cells with a sample mass of about 250 g [18].…”
Section: Phase Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because of the very low dependence of this maximum temperature on the homogeneity and stability of the furnace temperature. On the other hand, the slopes of freezing and melting curves depend on both the homogeneity of the temperature profile of the furnace and the segregation of impurities [18]. In order to derive complementary information on the segregation of impurities during a fixed-point realization, better understanding and the correction of thermal effects are necessary.…”
Section: Thermal Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation