2014
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new phyllopod bed-like assemblage from the Burgess Shale of the Canadian Rockies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
106
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, and despite sharing a common pathway of preservation (Gaines et al 2012a), variations in preservation of anatomical aspects within and among species and different Burgess Shale-type fossil assemblages are still poorly understood, in particular in the vicinity of the Burgess Shale itself. In the Burgess Shale Formation, soft-bodied fossils occur in more than a dozen stratigraphically related localities above and along the Cathedral Escarpment, from Fossil Ridge to the Monarch, 60 km to the southeast (Collins et al 1983;Johnston et al 2009;Caron et al 2010Caron et al , 2014, offering a rare opportunity for comparative taphonomic and paleoecological study at a regional scale. Unfortunately, most of these sites are difficult to access, are still poorly known, and few have been sufficiently sampled to warrant more detailed quantitative comparisons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, and despite sharing a common pathway of preservation (Gaines et al 2012a), variations in preservation of anatomical aspects within and among species and different Burgess Shale-type fossil assemblages are still poorly understood, in particular in the vicinity of the Burgess Shale itself. In the Burgess Shale Formation, soft-bodied fossils occur in more than a dozen stratigraphically related localities above and along the Cathedral Escarpment, from Fossil Ridge to the Monarch, 60 km to the southeast (Collins et al 1983;Johnston et al 2009;Caron et al 2010Caron et al , 2014, offering a rare opportunity for comparative taphonomic and paleoecological study at a regional scale. Unfortunately, most of these sites are difficult to access, are still poorly known, and few have been sufficiently sampled to warrant more detailed quantitative comparisons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As in Cambrian Burgess Shale-type biotas (Caron & Jackson 2008;Caron et al 2014;Zhao et al 2014), species diversity and abundance in the EBS are dominated by panarthropods, which comprise 28 recorded species to date, with several yet to be described. The survey of the biota below is accordingly focused on arthropods, with taxonomic groups drawing on the classification of Legg et al (2013).…”
Section: The Emu Bay Shale Biota: Diversity and Palaeobiogeographicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4,5] Other examples of exceptionally preserved biotas include the plants and animals found in the Carboniferous Mazon Creek concretions of Illinois ( Figure 3D), [6] the fishes that preserve phosphatized subcellular details of muscle tissue in the Cretaceous Santana Formation concretions from Brazil, [7] and the feathered dinosaurs that reveal evidence of plumage color and flight capability from the Cretaceous Jehol sequences of north-eastern China (Figure 2A). [8] Despite the diversity of settings that yield exceptionally preserved fossils, many Konservat-Lagerstaẗten share biological and geological processes such as rapid burial, limited or no bioturbation, decay suppression through anoxia or euxinia, and sealing of sedimentary laminae by microbial mats and early diagenetic cements (Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%