2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-009-1223-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new SNP haplotype associated with blue disease resistance gene in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Abstract: Resistance to cotton blue disease (CBD) was evaluated in 364 F(2.3) families of three populations derived from resistant variety 'Delta Opal'. The CBD resistance in 'Delta Opal' was controlled by one single dominant gene designated Cbd. Two simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers were identified as linked to Cbd by bulked segregant analysis. Cbd resides at the telomere region of chromosome 10. SSR marker DC20027 was 0.75 cM away from Cbd. DC20027 marker fragments amplified from 3 diploid species and 13 cotton var… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genetic mapping of CBT resistance confirms that the gene is near the CBD resistance gene mapped by Fang et al (2010) using three populations of 'Delta Opal' crossed to the susceptible cultivars 'DP388', 'DP5305' and 'SG747'. Our mapping suggests that Cbt is located in an adjacent region but is not likely to be the same gene conferring CBD resistance (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Genetic mapping of CBT resistance confirms that the gene is near the CBD resistance gene mapped by Fang et al (2010) using three populations of 'Delta Opal' crossed to the susceptible cultivars 'DP388', 'DP5305' and 'SG747'. Our mapping suggests that Cbt is located in an adjacent region but is not likely to be the same gene conferring CBD resistance (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…1). However, the genetic distance and marker order between the flanking Cbd markers NG0204310 and NG0211495 (DC20027) are different in our population compared to Fang et al (2010) possibly due a chromosomal rearrangement, making direct comparisons difficult (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations