A new species of the family Hypsipterygidae from Vietnam, with notes on the hypsipterygid fore wing venation (Heteroptera, Dipsocoromorpha)

Rédei, Dávid

doi:10.1002/mmnd.200700004

Cited by 8 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The infraorder is subdivided into five morphologi cally quite distinctive families and comprises only about 320 described species (Stys 1995;Henry 2009), leaving thousands of species undiscovered and unnamed (Stys, unpublished). The scarce systematic activity in recent years has focused on distribution records and the description of some new recent and fossil taxa (Hill 1992(Hill , 2004Halbert and Brambila 2002;Hoffman et al 2005;Carpintero and Dellape 2006;Redei 2007Redei , 2008aHenry et al 2010), as well as on comparative morphological studies of spermathecae (Pluot-Sigwalt and Pericart 2003), ovaries (Stys et al 1998), wing venation (Redei 2007b), and chromosomes (Grozeva and Nokkala 1996).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Litter bugs exposed: phylogenetic relationships of Dipsocoromorpha (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) based on molecular data

Weirauch

Štys

2014

Insect Syst Evol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Species in the heteropteran infraorder Dipsocoromorpha, or litter bugs, are small, cryptic, stunningly diverse and understudied. In addition to the vast amount of species discovery and morphological explora tion that remain to be done in this group, phylogenetic relationships within the litter bugs are poorly understood. A phylogenetic framework will make Dipsocoromorpha more accessible for systematic stud ies at all levels and is therefore a first step towards a comprehensive treatment of the group. Using a molecular dataset (87 taxa of Hemiptera including 35 Dipsocoromorpha; two genes) and maximum likelihood and parsimony methods, we here aim to test, for the first time using cladistic methods and a comprehensive dataset, relationships within Dipsocoromorpha. We investigate if Dipsocoromorpha are monophyletic, shed light on the relationships among the three families included in this analysis, and study relationships within the largest family of Dipsocoromorpha, the Schizopteridae. Based on this dataset, we find that the monophyly of Dipsocoromorpha is strongly supported in all analyses and that Ceratocombidae and Dipsocoridae together are recovered as the sister group of Schizopteridae. Within Schizopteridae, Hypselosomatinae are treated as the sister group to a dade formed by the monophyletic Ogeriinae and monophyletic Schizopterinae. Within Schizopterinae, there is evidence for the monophyly of the Corixidea genus group, and we present additional infra-generic and genus-level hypotheses. We discuss these hypotheses in the light of current classifications and hypotheses on relationships and as the first contribu tion towards revealing the phylogenetic relationships of a remarkable and neglected clade of true bugs.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Litter bugs exposed: phylogenetic relationships of Dipsocoromorpha (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) based on molecular data

Weirauch

Štys

2014

Insect Syst Evol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The aedeagus is typically comprised of basal plates (single or multiple sclerites at the base), phallosoma or phallotheca (typically more or less sclerotized portion), and endosoma (that can be sclerotized or membranous, and typically retracts into the phallosoma; Singh-Pruthi, 1925). Snodgrass (1936,1957) Esaki andMiyamoto (1959, 1960), Hill (1987aHill ( , 1987b, Hill (1984Hill ( , 2004 w/o bp, Wygodzinsky (1948aWygodzinsky ( , 1948bWygodzinsky ( , 1950aWygodzinsky ( , 1950bWygodzinsky ( , 1953 Penis Carvalho (1989), Linnavuori (1974) Phallus Drake (1961), Rédei (2007Rédei ( , 2008aRédei ( , 2008b, Rédei, Ren, and Bu (2012), Štys (1970, 1974, 1977, 1982, 1983a, 1983b, 1985), Wygodzinsky ( , 1962 Anal tube at Tubular structure composed of membranous portion of segment 10 and entire segment 11…”

Section: Terminology For Male Intromittent Organ and Its Componentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Anal tube Carpintero and Dellapé (2006), China (1946), Emsley (1969), Hill (1980Hill ( , 1984Hill ( , 1987b Anal cone Wygodzinsky (1948b) Anophore ano Sclerite (typically tubular) of segment 10 Anophore Emsley (1969), Gross (1951), Hill (1980Hill ( , 1987aHill ( , 1987bHill ( , 2004Hill ( , 2013, Hill (1984) as t9?, Štys (1970), Wygodzinsky (1950aWygodzinsky ( , 1950bWygodzinsky ( , 1953 Proctiger Rédei (2008a), Rédei (2008b) As s10 + 11, Štys (1974, 1977, 1982, 1983a, 1983b, 1985) Anophoric process anop (anterior) process of anophore Anophoric process Hill (1984), Knyshov, Leon, Hoey-Chamberlain, and Weirauch (2016) Anophoric appendage Emsley (1969), Hill (1980Hill ( , 1984 Paraproctal appendage Carpintero and Dellapé (2006) Apical process of paramere app Main dorsally or laterally directed process of paramere Apical process Rédei (2007) Apical appendage Štys (1970) Distal lobe Hill (2013) Hypophysis Rédei (2008b), Štys (1983a, 1983b) Appendage of mediotergite # mt#ap Basal plates bp Basal part of aedeagus that is in Dipsocoromorpha also tightly associated with parameres Basal plate(s) Emsley (1969), Hill (1980Hill ( , 1984Hill ( , 1987aHill ( , 1987bHil...…”

Section: Terminology For Male Intromittent Organ and Its Componentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Conjunctival sclerite Hill (1980Hill ( , 1987bHill ( , 2004Hill ( , 2013 Azar, Nel, Coty, and Garrouste (2010), Hill (1980Hill ( , 1987aHill ( , 2013, Melber and Köhler (1992), Pericart and Matocq (2003), Štys (1958, 1970, 1974, 1977, 1982, 1983a, 1983b) Parasternite Emsley (1969), Linnavuori (1974), Wygodzinsky (1948aWygodzinsky ( , 1948bWygodzinsky ( , 1953 Paratergite Emsley (1969) Mediotergite mt Paramere lp, rp Paramere Carpintero and Dellapé (2006), Carvalho (1989), China (1946), Drake (1961), Emsley (1969), Esaki and Miyamoto (1959), Hill (1980Hill ( , 1984Hill ( , 1987aHill ( , 1987bHill ( , 2004Hill ( , 2013, Melber and Köhler (1992), Miyamoto (1960Miyamoto ( , 1964, Pericart and Matocq (2003), Rédei (2007Rédei ( , 2008bRédei ( , 2008a, Rédei et al (2012), Štys (1970, 1974, 1977, 1982, 1983a, 1983b, 1985), Wygodzinsky (1953Wygodzinsky ( , 1962 Clasper Gross (1951),...…”

Section: Terminology For Male Intromittent Organ and Its Componentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Pregenital abdomen Rédei et al (2012), Štys (1970, 1983a) Pregenital segments Carpintero and Dellapé (2006), Emsley (1969), Hill (1984) Process of mediotergite # mt#p Pygophore pyg Abdominal segment 9 Pygophore Carpintero and Dellapé (2006), Carvalho (1989), China (1946), Gross (1951), Linnavuori (1974), Rédei (2008bRédei ( , 2008a, Štys (1970, 1974, 1982, 1983a, 1983b, 1985), Wygodzinsky (1962) Genital capsule China (1946), Emsley (1969), Esaki and Miyamoto (1959), Hill (1980Hill ( , 1984Hill ( , 1987bHill ( , 2004Hill ( , 2013, Miyamoto (1964), Rédei (2007), Rédei et al (2012), Wygodzinsky (1948b Hypopygium Linnavuori (1974), McAtee and Malloch (1925), Wygodzinsky (1948aWygodzinsky ( , 1948aWygodzinsky ( , 1953 Sclerite of phallosoma sph Segment s Sternum st Sternum Emsley (1969), Hill (1980Hill ( , 1984, Štys (1985) 3 | RESULTS which occur on the anterior area of the abdomen, the entire abdomen, or are restricted to segment 7. We suspect that most modifications of segment 7 are related to genitalic functions; however, we here follow the traditional subdivision of pregenital and genital abdomen at the border of segments 7 and 8.…”

Section: Terminology For Male Intromittent Organ and Its Componentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Comparative morphology of male genitalic structures in the minute litter bugs Dipsocoromorpha (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera)

Knyshov

Hoey-Chamberlain

Weirauch

2018

Journal of Morphology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Insect male genitalia show an evolutionarily variable morphology that has proven to be valuable for both, species identifications and phylogenetic analyses at higher taxonomic levels. Accurate usage of genitalic characters in taxonomic descriptions and phylogenetic analyses depends on consistency of terminology and validity of homology hypotheses. Both areas are underdeveloped in many insect groups. We here document the morphology and advance homology hypotheses of male genitalic features for the hemipteran infraorder Dipsocoromorpha, the minute litter bugs. Genitalic structures and the pregenital abdomen in Dipsocoromorpha are strikingly modified and diverse compared to other Heteroptera. In addition to variation in the shape of phallic structures (parameres and aedeagus), minute litter bug genitalia vary in the direction and degree of asymmetry and feature a plethora of processes derived from various abdominal segments with significant variation at low taxonomic levels. Here, male genitalic structures for an extensive taxonomic sample (32 genera and 71 specimens) are documented using scanning electron and confocal microscopy, and a universal terminology for genitalic structures across minute litter bugs is established that will facilitate species discovery and evolutionary research. We conclude by proposing primary homology hypotheses across the infraorder that now can be tested in a phylogenetic framework.

show abstract

Biodiversity of Heteroptera

Henry

2017

Insect Biodiversity

140

117

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A new species of the family Hypsipterygidae from Vietnam, with notes on the hypsipterygid fore wing venation (Heteroptera, Dipsocoromorpha)

Cited by 8 publications

References 4 publications

Litter bugs exposed: phylogenetic relationships of Dipsocoromorpha (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) based on molecular data

Litter bugs exposed: phylogenetic relationships of Dipsocoromorpha (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) based on molecular data

Comparative morphology of male genitalic structures in the minute litter bugs Dipsocoromorpha (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera)

Biodiversity of Heteroptera

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About