2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2006.00882.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new system to detect residual subgingival calculus: in vitro detection limits

Abstract: This calculus detection system was able to detect small deposits. In clinical practice, this device may support dentists in deciding whether to stop or to continue the debridement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Very early diagnosis of disease by radiography is difficult. Recently, several novel techniques have been developed for diagnosis of dental disease, such as a smart ultrasonic devices [29,3537], LED-based dental optical probes [38], and laser fluorescence [39,40]. Raman and laser fluorescence spectrometers may also be applied in the detection of dental disease but are still under investigation.…”
Section: Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very early diagnosis of disease by radiography is difficult. Recently, several novel techniques have been developed for diagnosis of dental disease, such as a smart ultrasonic devices [29,3537], LED-based dental optical probes [38], and laser fluorescence [39,40]. Raman and laser fluorescence spectrometers may also be applied in the detection of dental disease but are still under investigation.…”
Section: Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the need arises to find a new, non-destructive technique that can be employed in the imaging of dental tissues. Currently, several innovative techniques are being developed for the diagnosis of dental diseases, such as a smart ultrasonic device, [33][34][35] LED-based dental optical probes, 36 and laser fluorescence. 37,38 Table 1 shows a comparison of dental OCT and other dental diagnostic modalities that are currently in practice.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Dental Diagnostic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diameter, circumference and area of the smallest recognizable deposit, and of the no longer recognizable deposit, were measured, and a cut‐off point was determined. It could be demonstrated that calculus deposits with a diameter of 0.2 mm could still be recognized with a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 80% (40).…”
Section: Combined Detection/treatment Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%