2015
DOI: 10.1109/access.2015.2480422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Transient Attack on the Kish Key Distribution System

Abstract: The Kish Key Distribution (KKD) system has been proposed as a classical alternative to quantum key distribution, making use of temperature-matched thermal noise. Previous analyses assume instant propagation of signals along the cable connecting the two users. We describe a new attack that takes an advantage of propagation delays. At the start of each bit period, the noise temperature will then be increased from zero to its final value. During this process, the noise temperature variation will take time to prop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We have confirmed GAA's conclusion [15] that their attack works with about p = 0.7-0.8, where p is Eve's probability of successfully guessing the key-bits. These values of p require four stages of the simplest XORbased privacy amplification in order to reduce p to its ideal range of 0.5 < p < 0.5006 [33], which implies a corresponding 16-fold slowdown of the key exchange.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We have confirmed GAA's conclusion [15] that their attack works with about p = 0.7-0.8, where p is Eve's probability of successfully guessing the key-bits. These values of p require four stages of the simplest XORbased privacy amplification in order to reduce p to its ideal range of 0.5 < p < 0.5006 [33], which implies a corresponding 16-fold slowdown of the key exchange.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…The present paper concerns the classical statistical-physicsbased Kirchhoff-law-Johnson-noise (KLJN) key distribution system, delineated in Figure 1, which is no exception to the tradition of the research area, and the creation of the KLJN schemes [3,4] immediately triggered attacks [5][6][7]. The various attacks [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] have led to useful discussions [17][18][19][20][21][22][23], including corrections of flaws in the attacks [19][20][21][22][23] and developments of new defense protocols [5,10,11,13,24,25] as well as protocols that have increased immunity against attacks in general [24][25][26][27]. Furthermore, KLJN schemes that are totally immune to a certain attack have been presented [13,[28][29][30] as has a new system that is immune to all existing attacks [31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…None of them could impair the unconditional security of the scheme, since either there was a proper defense scheme against or attack was based on misconceptions [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][27][28][29][30], including experimental errors. On the other hand, passive attacks against practical KLJN systems deviating from the ideal assumptions of the scheme [2] were discussed in several papers [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. For example, parasitic or non-ideal features such as transients, wire's resistance, cable capacitance, temperature differences, delay effects and transients, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%