2005
DOI: 10.1007/11556992_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Non-redundant and Efficient Architecture for Karatsuba-Ofman Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of applications in a variety of areas, such as cryptography and coding theory, new techniques for improving polynomial multiplication have been presented in numerous papers, e.g., [1,4,5,7,8,[13][14][15][16][17][18]20,[23][24][25]27,28]. For cryptographic applications, arithmetic in the binary extension field F 2 n is often used and, of the basic operations in F 2 n , multiplication contributes most to the total number of bit operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of applications in a variety of areas, such as cryptography and coding theory, new techniques for improving polynomial multiplication have been presented in numerous papers, e.g., [1,4,5,7,8,[13][14][15][16][17][18]20,[23][24][25]27,28]. For cryptographic applications, arithmetic in the binary extension field F 2 n is often used and, of the basic operations in F 2 n , multiplication contributes most to the total number of bit operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, Karatsuba's method saves many bit operations at this size. See, e.g., [4], [42], [18], [48], [45], [41], [8], [9], and [21]. Bernstein's Karatsuba/Toom combination in [9] multiplies 256-bit polynomials using only about 133 · 256 bit operations.…”
Section: New Speeds For Binary-fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, its complexity is 2n 2 +O(n). Many researchers have tried to improve this algorithm, following two main directions: (1) provide a better asymptotic estimation [34,16,35,24]; (2) reduce the effective number of bit operations [5,12,14,22,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their aim is to improve bounds published in literature for specific value (small) of n, and these improvements that are not visible in the asymptotics. Consequently, a number of papers tries to reduce the effective number of bit operations [34,16,35,24]. As far as we know, the best explicit upper bounds for the polynomial multiplication appear in [6,19,21,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%