2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.disc.2015.10.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on difference matrices over non-cyclic finite abelian groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, as immediate consequence of the main results on (H , 4, 1)-DM (see [30,50]), we have the following. There exists a homogeneous (H , 3, 1)-DM with H abelian of even order if and only if the 2-Sylow subgroup of H is not cyclic.…”
Section: Composition Constructions Via Difference Matricessupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Thus, as immediate consequence of the main results on (H , 4, 1)-DM (see [30,50]), we have the following. There exists a homogeneous (H , 3, 1)-DM with H abelian of even order if and only if the 2-Sylow subgroup of H is not cyclic.…”
Section: Composition Constructions Via Difference Matricessupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Lemma 3.1 (Pan and Chang [28]). If G is an abelian group and no cyclic, then there exists a G ( , 4, 1)-DM if and only if the 2-Sylow subgroup of G is not cyclic.…”
Section: Recursive Constructions For Rdfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…m n ( , ) = (6, 48): {(0, 0), (4, 44), (5,3), (3,11)}, {(0, 0), (5,28), (3,4), (4, 35)}, {(0, 0), (4, 7), (3,12), (0, 38)}, {(0, 0), (4,45), (1,17), (1,24)}, {(0, 0), (0, 5), (2,22), (0, 28)}, {(0, 0), (3,9), (1,21), (5, 30)}, {(0, 0), (5,1), (1,16), (2, 20)}, {(0, 0), (1,46), (4,5), (4, 16)}, {(0, 0), (1,40), (1,6), (2,19)}, {(0, 0), (2,46), (3,23), (4,14)}, {(0, 0), (4,43), (3,15), (3,17)}, {(0, 0), (4, 37), (0, 39), (5, 39)}, {(0, 0), (2,45), (2,<...>…”
Section: Appendix Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When u and v are not coprime, the construction of optimal (u, v, k, λ a , λ c )-OOSPCs becomes difficult. For k = 3, 4, some results have been obtained for optimal (u, v, k, λ a , λ c )-OOSPCs [5], [6], [20], [22], [23], [19], [27], [28]. For general weight k, some results on (asymptotically ) optimal (u, v, k, λ a , λ c )-OOSPCs are also obtained [14], [21], [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since gcd(p, 48)=1, then Z 2 × Z 48p is isomorphic to Z 2 × Z 48 × Z p . Let B 1 = {(0, 0, 1), (0, 0, −1), (0, 1, ), (0, 1, − )}; B 2 = {(0, 0, 0), (0, 24, ξ 2 ), (1, 0, ξ 2 + ξ), (1, 24, 2ξ 2 )}; B 3 = {(0, 0, 0), (0, 6, 1), (0, 14, 2), (1,19,3), (1,36,4)}; {(0,0),(0,13), (2,12),(2,16)}, {(0,0),(0,5), (1,19),(2,1),(2,2)}, {(0,0), (1,5), (1,15),(2,7),(2,15)}, {(0,0),(0,2), (1,13), (1,20)}.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%