“…Although in these trials no ewes were inseminated with frozen-thawed semen via the cervical route, to permit a direct comparison with the intra-uterine technique, the overall conception rates achieved were as good as, and in many cases higher than, those reported in the literature following cervical insemination of frozen-thawed semen (Colas, 1979;Maxwell et al, 1980;Colas and Guerin, 1981;Curnock et al, 1984;Haresign et al, 1986;Fiser, Ainsworth and Fairfull, 1987). Furthermore, these better conception rates were achieved with much smaller semen volumes (motile sperm numbers), and as such illustrate that the technique can have a marked effect on increasing selection pressure through the male line.…”