“…Since the PRNU extraction is relying on a denoising of the image, the resulting pattern might be contaminated with different signals, such as other high frequency image components, e.g., edges, or different types of nonunique artefacts (NUAs) [67]. Many alternative PRNU extraction schemes [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74] and PRNU enhancements [75], [76], [77], [78], [79] have been proposed in literature to attenuate different types of PRNU contaminations and improve the quality of the extracted PRNU in source camera identification scenarios. However, to the best of our knowledge, their impact on the general properties of the PRNU signal has not yet been extensively investigated.…”