2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-016-1334-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel method for pair-matching using three-dimensional digital models of bone: mesh-to-mesh value comparison

Abstract: The commingling of human remains often hinders forensic/physical anthropologists during the identification process, as there are limited methods to accurately sort these remains. This study investigates a new method for pair-matching, a common individualization technique, which uses digital three-dimensional models of bone: mesh-to-mesh value comparison (MVC). The MVC method digitally compares the entire three-dimensional geometry of two bones at once to produce a single value to indicate their similarity. Two… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
70
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
70
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While whole-surface algorithms were developed originally for human faces, it can be applied to any type of surface data where there is a natural correspondence. Regarding full-surface long bone data, they have been studied within comparative anatomy [21], biomedicine [2224] and forensic anthropology (to match paired elements) [25]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While whole-surface algorithms were developed originally for human faces, it can be applied to any type of surface data where there is a natural correspondence. Regarding full-surface long bone data, they have been studied within comparative anatomy [21], biomedicine [2224] and forensic anthropology (to match paired elements) [25]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shape and form analyses have become more popular in physical and forensic anthropology (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15) with a few studies focused on matching algorithms (6,(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). With the adoption of shape analysis, the literature on osteological sorting has started to shift from linear metric approaches (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) to shape and form approaches (10)(11)(12). However, the current literature on shape and form osteological pair-matching has exclusively focused on complete skeletal elements (10)(11)(12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shape analysis has become commonplace in biological fields (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10), such as physical anthropology (11,12), and more recently forensic anthropology (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). However, much of the existing literature relies on methods designed for analyzing shapes in a different manner than is required for pair-matching.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%