2011
DOI: 10.1002/term.364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel method for the isolation of subpopulations of rat adipose stem cells with different proliferation and osteogenic differentiation potentials

Abstract: Bone marrow has been the elected cell source of studies published so far concerning bone and cartilage tissue-engineering approaches. Recent studies indicate that adipose tissue presents significant advantages over bone marrow as a cell source for tissue engineering. Most of these studies report the use of adipose stem cells (ASCs) isolated by a method based on the enzymatic digestion of the adipose tissue and on the ability of stem cells to adhere to a cell culture plastic surface. Using this method, a hetero… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, viable, homogenous and phenotypically stable subpopulations of human and rat ASCs were successfully separated from crude populations (Mihaila et al, ; Rada et al, ; Rada, Gomes, & Reis, ; Rada, Reis, & Gomes, ) using the immunomagnetic sorting (IMS) method, enabling to select subpopulations that were found to be more prone to osteogenic (Rada, Gomes, et al, ; Rada et al, ), chondrogenic (Rada, Reis, et al, ) or endothelial differentiation (Mihaila et al, ). Therefore, purification of ASC subpopulations opens new prospects for tissue engineering applications, which may take advantage of (potentially autologous) cell sources predisposed to differentiate into specific lineages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous studies, viable, homogenous and phenotypically stable subpopulations of human and rat ASCs were successfully separated from crude populations (Mihaila et al, ; Rada et al, ; Rada, Gomes, & Reis, ; Rada, Reis, & Gomes, ) using the immunomagnetic sorting (IMS) method, enabling to select subpopulations that were found to be more prone to osteogenic (Rada, Gomes, et al, ; Rada et al, ), chondrogenic (Rada, Reis, et al, ) or endothelial differentiation (Mihaila et al, ). Therefore, purification of ASC subpopulations opens new prospects for tissue engineering applications, which may take advantage of (potentially autologous) cell sources predisposed to differentiate into specific lineages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the main aim of this study was to identify and characterize a subpopulation of hASCs prone to tenogenic differentiation. For this purpose, hASCs subpopulations were isolated from hASCs and sorted with IMS using CD29, STRO‐1, and SSEA‐4 antibodies based on previous studies of hASCs subpopulations (Mihaila et al, ; Mihaila, Resende, Reis, Gomes, & Marques, ; Rada, Gomes, et al, ; Rada, Reis, et al, ; Rada et al, ), and tenomodulin (TNMD), a highly expressed marker in tendons and ligaments (Brandau, Meindl, Fassler, & Aszodi, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common and effective method currently reported for isolation of a specific cell type involves the use of magnetic beads coated with antibodies for target cells. This technique requires the attachment of magnetic beads to the cells that may be undesirable for cell-based therapeutic applications [15,16].…”
Section: Cell Capture Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with currently available devices found in literature the system herein proposed besides effective it is relatively low cost using a biomaterial with easy chemistry that can be later implantable [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The method proposed in this work allows the isolation of a target cell type from a mixed cell population with relatively high purity, decreasing cell handling where recruited cells can be used straightaway.…”
Section: Cell Capture Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation