2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10489-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pan-cancer analysis of synonymous mutations

Abstract: Synonymous mutations have been viewed as silent mutations, since they only affect the DNA and mRNA, but not the amino acid sequence of the resulting protein. Nonetheless, recent studies suggest their significant impact on splicing, RNA stability, RNA folding, translation or co-translational protein folding. Hence, we compile 659194 synonymous mutations found in human cancer and characterize their properties. We provide the user-friendly, comprehensive resource for synonymous mutations in cancer, SynMICdb ( … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
127
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
11
127
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of allelic variants can be determined by analyzing the position and LD block of the associated SNP within an lncRNA sequence; SNPs not only affect gene expression, but they also influence secondary structure (Castellanos-Rubio and Ghosh, 2019). In addition, a previous study demonstrated that a single SNP could alter RNA conformation (Sharma et al, 2019). A similar behavior has been observed for haplotype blocks, the majority of which influence secondary structures of lncRNA transcripts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The impact of allelic variants can be determined by analyzing the position and LD block of the associated SNP within an lncRNA sequence; SNPs not only affect gene expression, but they also influence secondary structure (Castellanos-Rubio and Ghosh, 2019). In addition, a previous study demonstrated that a single SNP could alter RNA conformation (Sharma et al, 2019). A similar behavior has been observed for haplotype blocks, the majority of which influence secondary structures of lncRNA transcripts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…We thus conclude that these NF1 variants classified as synonymous very likely do have downstream transcriptomic effects aligned with those of active NF1 mutations. Although this finding contradicts the intuition that so-called silent mutations should not imbue significant downstream impacts, it is less surprising in light of prior work demonstrating that these mutations can indeed enact non-trivial effects on splicing, transcript folding/stability, translational rates, co-translational folding/stability, and degradation 53,54 . Although NF1 splice mutations are often mistaken for silent mutations by sequencing methods 55,56 , evidence that synonymous mutations of the NF1 gene are selected in cancers such as T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia 57 signals a need for more research in this area.…”
Section: Subgroupings Outperform Mutation Subsets Chosen Using Varianmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The g.727C > T mutation of the LHβ gene identified in this study is also a synonymous mutation. Nonetheless, recent studies suggest synonymous mutations can change protein levels or protein conformation by altering regulatory splice sites, mRNA stability, miRNA binding sites, or translation efficiency [29]. To further investigate the effect of this synonymous mutation on sheep phenotype, we analyzed the potential association between genotype and litter size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%