2022
DOI: 10.3390/electronics11193134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Performance-Oriented Optimization Framework Combining Meta-Heuristics and Entropy-Weighted TOPSIS for Multi-Objective Sustainable Supply Chain Network Design

Abstract: The decision-making of sustainable supply chain network (SSCN) design is a strategy capacity for configuring network facility and product flow. When optimizing conflicting economic, environmental, and social performance objectives, it is difficult to select the optimal scheme from obtained feasible decision schemes. In this article, according to the triple bottom line of sustainability, a multi-objective sustainable supply chain network optimization model is developed, and a novel performance-oriented optimiza… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of different decision-making methods are listed in Table 3, according to the methods described in the literature. Relative proximity is used for PT-TOPSIS [39] and EW-TOPSIS [8], while prospect values are used for other methods. From Table 3, we can see that the final decision results obtained by the proposed method are consistent with the decision outcomes of various prospect theory models, including prospect theory TOPSIS (PT-TOPSIS) [39], entropy weight TOPSIS (EW-TOPSIS) [8], classical prospect theory (PT) [24], fuzzy prospect theory (FPT) [33], and rough numbers-based prospect theory (RPT) [26].…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Using Different Methods For Decision-ma...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results of different decision-making methods are listed in Table 3, according to the methods described in the literature. Relative proximity is used for PT-TOPSIS [39] and EW-TOPSIS [8], while prospect values are used for other methods. From Table 3, we can see that the final decision results obtained by the proposed method are consistent with the decision outcomes of various prospect theory models, including prospect theory TOPSIS (PT-TOPSIS) [39], entropy weight TOPSIS (EW-TOPSIS) [8], classical prospect theory (PT) [24], fuzzy prospect theory (FPT) [33], and rough numbers-based prospect theory (RPT) [26].…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Using Different Methods For Decision-ma...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(A 1 , A 2 , A 3 ) = (0.7009, −0.3050, −1.5849) A 1 ≻ A 2 ≻ A 3 PT-TOPSIS [39] (A 1 , A 2 , A 3 ) = (1.0000, 0.3607, 0.0000) A 1 ≻ A 2 ≻ A 3 EW-TOPSIS [8] (A 1 , A 2 , A 3 ) = (0.631, 0.369, 0.000) A 1 ≻ A 2 ≻ A 3 PT [24] (A 1 , A 2 , A 3 ) = (0.6742, −0.3404, −1.517) [33] (A 1 , A 2 , A 3 ) = (0.6746, −0.4329, −1.5186) [26] (A 1 , A 2 , A 3 ) = (0.6739, −0.4498, −1.5165)…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Low-carbon logistics capacity evaluation is a typical multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) issue, which utilizes multiple measurement indicators for assessing provincial low-carbon logistics capacity. As a generally used MCDM method, the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) is a methodology used to sort finite evaluation objects according to their proximity to the ideal solution, which has been widely used to evaluate concerns [42,46]. In order to highlight the varying degrees of importance of various indicators in the evaluation index, this paper employs the entropy method to calculate the weights for multiple indicators and then combines the TOPSIS model to evaluate and rank the low-carbon logistics capacity [47,48].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%