Interspeech 2007 2007
DOI: 10.21437/interspeech.2007-180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phonetic search approach to the 2006 NIST spoken term detection evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we propose to use a multilingual vector representation to characterize the spoken utterances from English, Malay and Tamil. Representing the speech signal with phonetic features from other languages have shown to be useful in many tasks, including speech recognition [26], spoken term detection [27], speech summarization [28], and spoken language identification [29]. However, such multilingual representations have not been applied to speech evaluation.…”
Section: Multilingual Phonemic Embeddingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we propose to use a multilingual vector representation to characterize the spoken utterances from English, Malay and Tamil. Representing the speech signal with phonetic features from other languages have shown to be useful in many tasks, including speech recognition [26], spoken term detection [27], speech summarization [28], and spoken language identification [29]. However, such multilingual representations have not been applied to speech evaluation.…”
Section: Multilingual Phonemic Embeddingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, alternative representations that can also capture out-of-vocabulary words are required -for example, each word in the recognized lattice can be expressed in terms of its constituent phones. During retrieval, out-of-vocabulary words can then be found by matching their sub-word (for example, phonetic) representation against such phone-based lattices (Wallace et al, 2007). Other sub-word decompositions have also been employed successfully (Szöke, 2010), but in most cases detection of out-of-vocabulary words remains substantially inferior to that of in-vocabulary words.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other sub-word decompositions have also been employed successfully (Szöke, 2010), but in most cases detection of out-of-vocabulary words remains substantially inferior to that of in-vocabulary words. Although the query by example methods in Hazen et al (2009), Zhang and Glass (2009), Zhang et al (2012) achieve promising detection rates, retrieval is significantly more demanding computationally than with index-based approaches (Wallace et al, 2007). In Hazen et al (2009), it is therefore recommended that such methods be used as a rescoring mechanism for terms retrieved by a cruder (index-based) approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, a phoneme-based system is used to handle OOV terms, e.g., [3], [4], [9], [10]. In this approach, search terms are converted to pronunciations by letter-to-sound (LTS) models, and the pronunciations are searched for in a phoneme lattice generated by a speech recogniser.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%