A pilot study of the Incredible Years BASIC parenting programme with bereaved families

Braiden, Hannah‐Jane; McDaniel, Benny; Duffy, Joseph; McCann, Monica

doi:10.1108/17466661111176015

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several behavior management and parenting EBTs have adapted the original design to target the needs of specialized populations. For example, the Triple P Parenting Program has been adapted for obese and gifted children (Morawska & Sanders, 2009; West, Sanders, Cleghorn, & Savies, 2010) and The Incredible Years program has been adapted for bereaved and substance abusing parents (Braiden, McDaniel, Duffy, & McCann, 2011; Stangera, Ryan, Hongyun, & Budney 2011). This trend is also seen in many of the PCIT research studies working with subpopulations (Berkovits, O’Brien, Carter, & Eyberg, 2010; Pincus, Eyberg, & Choate, 2005).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Parent–Child Interaction Therapy

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is common practice to augment efficacious treatment protocols for special populations (Durlak & DuPre, 2008), but this is often done before establishing that standard services are not appropriate. In this randomized controlled trial with families at risk or with a history of maltreatment (N = 151), we investigated the effectiveness of standard 12-session Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT). This is in contrast to other PCIT studies with similar parents, which have allowed for longer and sometimes variable treatment length and with modifications to PCIT protocol. After treatment and compared to Waitlist, mothers reported fewer child externalizing and internalizing behaviors, decreased stress, and were observed to have more positive verbalizations and maternal sensitivity. These outcomes were equivalent or better than outcomes of our previous PCIT trial with high-risk families (Thomas & Zimmer-Gembeck, 2011) when treatment length was variable and often longer. These findings support standard protocol PCIT as an efficacious intervention for families in the child welfare system.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Parent–Child Interaction Therapy

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Parenting programs can be defined as efforts designed to facilitate parent-child relationships and equip parents with the skills needed to perform parenting roles [22].…”

Section: Parenting Educationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Needs Analysis of Childrens’ Right Curriculum for Parenting Education

Nurhayati¹,

Nugraha²,

Solihah³

2021

Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Early Childhood Education (ICECE 2020)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research aims to find out the initial need for children's rights and how to fulfil children's rights in accordance with the mandate of the Child Protection Act and Islamic Law for the curriculum of parenting education programs. The explanation of the child's rights is an important knowledge for parents. The method used in this study is a case study on 100 parents in Cimahi City with purposive sampling techniques in determining respondents. The number of respondents was 100 parents who had children aged 0-18 years. Data collection techniques use interviews and observations as well as secondary data. This study found that: 1) parents have learned about a child's rights either under existing law or from the perspective of Islamic law, but still cannot fulfil it. 2) Curriculum of parenting programs refers to the rights of children in accordance with the Child Protection Act and the rights of children according to the perspective of Islamic law includes the correct paradigm of children, cultivating talents and encouraging children's natural potential, cultivating the roles of fathers and mothers as teachers for children, giving children and preparing children to be fair and civilized adults.

show abstract

“…Originally validated in English and Scottish populations of people aged 16 and older [ 15 ], the scale has now been translated into many different languages and validated in many different cultures [ 18 ]. It has been successfully used to measure wellbeing outcomes in a range of health interventions [ 19 – 25 ]. Evidence suggests that users of mental health services and their carers prefer the WEMWBS to other health outcome measures [ 26 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Where’s WALY? : A proof of concept study of the ‘wellbeing adjusted life year’ using secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data

Johnson

Jenkinson

Stinton

et al. 2016

Health Qual Life Outcomes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) is a measure that combines life extension and health improvement in a single score, reflecting preferences around different types of health gain. It can therefore be used to inform decision-making around allocation of health care resources to mutually exclusive options that would produce qualitatively different health benefits. A number of quality-of-life instruments can be used to calculate QALYs. The EQ-5D is one of the most commonly used, and is the preferred option for submissions to NICE (https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg9/). However, it has limitations that might make it unsuitable for use in areas such as public and mental health where interventions may aim to improve well-being. One alternative to the QALY is a Wellbeing-Adjusted Life Year. In this study we explore the need for a Wellbeing-Adjusted Life Year measure by examining the extent to which a measure of wellbeing (the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale) maps onto the EQ-5D-3L.MethodsSecondary analyses were conducted on data from the Coventry Household Survey in which 7469 participants completed the EQ-5D-3L, Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, and a measure of self-rated health. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlations, linear regression, and receiver operating characteristic curves.ResultsApproximately 75 % of participants scored the maximum on the EQ-5D-3L. Those with maximum EQ-5D-3L scores reported a wide range of levels of mental wellbeing. Both the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale and the EQ-5D-3L were able to detect differences between those with higher and lower levels of self-reported health. Linear regression indicated that scores on the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale and the EQ-5D-3L were weakly, positively correlated (with R2 being 0.104 for the index and 0.141 for the visual analogue scale).ConclusionThe Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale maps onto the EQ-5D-3L to only a limited extent. Levels of mental wellbeing varied greatly amongst participants who had the maximum score on the EQ-5D-3L. To evaluate the relative effectiveness of interventions that impact on mental wellbeing, a new measure – a Wellbeing Adjusted Life Year – is needed.

show abstract

A pilot study of the Incredible Years BASIC parenting programme with bereaved families

Cited by 5 publications

References 51 publications

Parent–Child Interaction Therapy

Parent–Child Interaction Therapy

Needs Analysis of Childrens’ Right Curriculum for Parenting Education

Where’s WALY? : A proof of concept study of the ‘wellbeing adjusted life year’ using secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About