2014 IEEE 20th International on-Line Testing Symposium (IOLTS) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iolts.2014.6873674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A placement strategy for reducing the effects of multiple faults in digital circuits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For METs (or MUBs), in [24], via calculation of pass/fail value for all possible pairs of the circuit, all pairs are decomposed into two sets: good pairs and bad pairs. A simulated annealing-based optimization is then accomplished for maximizing the elements of good pairs set.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For METs (or MUBs), in [24], via calculation of pass/fail value for all possible pairs of the circuit, all pairs are decomposed into two sets: good pairs and bad pairs. A simulated annealing-based optimization is then accomplished for maximizing the elements of good pairs set.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Most of them only consider SETs ( [23], [25], [26]) or METs ( [24], [27]) and do not cover all transient faults originated by both SETs and METs. It should be noted that most of the methods proposed for hardening against METs cannot be simplified to handle SETs because having multiple error sites and using their interactions is their main assumption.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modifying compiler-generated placement has the potential for masking SEMT-induced errors (Ebrahimi et al 2016) without cost to chip area, but without a charge sharing model based on shared wells in a placed and routed (P&R) IC, the benefits of this post-EDA placement are not clear. Alternatively, creating a new, reliability-focused placement algorithm could mask errors even further (Pagliarini and Pradhan 2014), again from a simple model excluding charge sharing, but at the high cost of 2x or more wirelength, design timing, and dynamic power draw.…”
Section: Motivation and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in [15], a careful analysis of the effect of placement with respect to multiple faults was performed. A placement engine that is fault-aware is proposed in [16], albeit presenting heavy overheads. An improved version is presented in [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%