2018
DOI: 10.3390/s18113954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A POSHE-Based Optimum Clip-Limit Contrast Enhancement Method for Ultrasonic Logging Images

Abstract: Enabled by piezoceramic transducers, ultrasonic logging images often suffer from low contrast and indistinct local details, which makes it difficult to analyze and interpret geologic features in the images. In this work, we propose a novel partially overlapped sub-block histogram-equalization (POSHE)-based optimum clip-limit contrast enhancement (POSHEOC) method to highlight the local details hidden in ultrasonic well logging images obtained through piezoceramic transducers. The proposed algorithm introduces t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The images obtained by HRCT scanning of the patient's lung as the target area are processed by the HRCT image enhancement algorithm, and the obtained images are illustrated in Figure 1. The multihistogram equalization enhancement algorithm was selected to process the images [16], and the images processed by the two methods were compared. Results: compared with the multihistogram equalization enhancement algorithm, the image processed by the HRCT image enhancement algorithm was clearer, the resolution was higher, the gray level was higher, and the contrast was clearer.…”
Section: Processing Results and Evaluation Indicators Of Hrctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The images obtained by HRCT scanning of the patient's lung as the target area are processed by the HRCT image enhancement algorithm, and the obtained images are illustrated in Figure 1. The multihistogram equalization enhancement algorithm was selected to process the images [16], and the images processed by the two methods were compared. Results: compared with the multihistogram equalization enhancement algorithm, the image processed by the HRCT image enhancement algorithm was clearer, the resolution was higher, the gray level was higher, and the contrast was clearer.…”
Section: Processing Results and Evaluation Indicators Of Hrctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The part clipped is then equally distributed upon all histogram bins. The selected threshold is 2.0 in CLAHE which helps limit the height of the histogram [28]. This means that the slope of the cumulative distribution function curve will be reduced.…”
Section: 𝐹(𝑖 𝑗mentioning
confidence: 99%